Hearing Preservation in Elderly Cochlear Implant Recipients

被引:11
作者
Bourn, Stephanie [1 ]
Goldstein, Mary Rose [1 ]
Jacob, Abraham [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Neurosci, Ear & Hearing, 2450 E River Rd, Tucson, AZ 85718 USA
关键词
Cochlear implant; Decentralized network; Elderly; Elderly cochlear implant recipients; Electroacoustic stimulation; Hearing preservation; Residual hearing; Soft surgical techniques;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000002596
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Examine hearing preservation rates in cochlear implant recipients 72 years and older. Study Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: Tertiary otology/neurotology practice. Patients: Cochlear implant recipients 72 years and older who are candidates for hearing preservation and were implanted between April 2017 and June 2018 Intervention: Surgical/rehabilitative. Main Outcome Measures: Hearing was measured preoperatively and 6 months after cochlear implantation. Results: Between April 2017 and June 2018, 125 cochlear implant operations were performed by the senior author (A.J.). Of these patients, 62 were over age 72 and comprehensive pre- and postoperative residual hearing data were available on 24 patients. Although several methods for calculating hearing preservation are evaluated, our practice has found that hearing preservation techniques should be used in all patients having even a single frequency <= 85dB HL between 125 and 2000Hz before surgery. Using this method, 60% of recipients had at least one postoperative threshold <= 85dB HL, and more importantly, over 80% of these patients subsequently used an electroacoustic MAP. Conclusion: Despite concerns about cochlear fragility in elderly patients, preservation of residual hearing is feasible in cochlear implant recipients 72 years and older. This suggests that the vast majority of patients, including an elderly cohort, can benefit from soft surgery techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 624
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Minimum Reporting Standards for Adult Cochlear Implantation [J].
Adunka, Oliver F. ;
Gantz, Bruce J. ;
Dunn, Camille ;
Gurgel, Richard K. ;
Buchman, Craig A. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 159 (02) :215-219
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OTOL NEUROTOL, DOI DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001909
[3]   Impact of Low-Frequency Hearing [J].
Buechner, A. ;
Schuessler, M. ;
Battmer, R. D. ;
Stoever, T. ;
Lesinski-Schiedat, A. ;
Lenarz, T. .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2009, 14 :8-13
[4]   Survey of the American Neurotology Society on Cochlear Implantation: Part 1, Candidacy Assessment and Expanding Indications [J].
Carlson, Matthew L. ;
Sladen, Douglas P. ;
Gurgel, Richard K. ;
Tombers, Nicole M. ;
Lohse, Christine M. ;
Driscoll, Colin L. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (01) :E12-E19
[5]   Cochlear Implantation in the Octogenarian and Nonagenarian [J].
Carlson, Matthew L. ;
Breen, Joseph T. ;
Gifford, Rene H. ;
Driscoll, Colin L. W. ;
Neff, Brian A. ;
Beatty, Charles W. ;
Peterson, Anna Mary ;
Olund, Amy P. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (08) :1343-1349
[6]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), 2005, CMS MAN SYST PUB
[7]   OCTO "Outcomes of Cochlear Implant for the Octogenarians: Audiologic and Quality-of-Life" [J].
Cloutier, Francois ;
Bussieres, Richard ;
Ferron, Pierre ;
Cote, Mathieu .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (01) :22-28
[8]   Cochlear Implantation Is Associated With Minimal Anesthetic Risk in the Elderly [J].
Coelho, Daniel H. ;
Yeh, Joseph ;
Kim, Jung T. ;
Lalwani, Anil K. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2009, 119 (02) :355-358
[9]   Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing [J].
Gantz, BJ ;
Turner, C ;
Gfeller, KE ;
Lowder, MW .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (05) :796-802
[10]   Combining acoustic and electrical hearing [J].
Gantz, BJ ;
Turner, CW .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2003, 113 (10) :1726-1730