What can we learn from farmers experiences and attitudes to Selective Dry Cow Therapy?

被引:0
作者
Orpin, P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pk Vet Grp, 82-84 High St, Whetstone LE8 6LQ, Leics, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Vet Med & Sci, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leics, England
关键词
Selective Dry Cow Therapy; attitudes; mastitis; teat sealant;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Blanket Dry Cow Therapy (BDCT) has been widely accepted by UK Dairy farmers since the adoption of the 5-point plan. The use of antibiotics in non-infected cows has brought into focus with concerns regarding antibiotic resistance and the global priority to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Selective Dry Cow therapy (SDCT) has recently gained momentum in the UK. A Survey Monkey (www.surveymonkey.co.uk) review of 497 farmers' attitudes towards SDCT is discussed. The survey revealed that 82% of farmers believed that reducing antibiotic usage would be good for their livestock but 55% feared that SDCT would result in death or mastitis without antibiotic use. Sixteen per cent had experienced severe mastitis and death of cows respectively after infusion of teat sealant alone. Fifty one percent of farmers were firm believers and would recommend SDCT to another farmer. However, the Net Promoter Score revealed there were more detractors (48%) than promoters (26%) indicating that without external support and encouragement the programme may fail if relying on farmer recommendation alone. Division of the farmers into 3 groups-Proactivists, Unconcerned and Disillusionists revealed that the requirements to engage each group differed. Proactivists were interested in training and vet support whereas the other two groups required more convincing that SDCT would work and the benefits outweighed the risks. In the Netherlands, a more structured approach was used to influence farmer behaviour and deploy SDCT. Alternative veterinary practiced driven programmes have been used to achieve the same effect. The paper aims to utilise feedback from 497 farmers to help inform opinion on how the UK could progress SDCT more effectively in the future based on the analysis of farmer experiences and attitudes to SDCT.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 139
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The effect of selective dry cow treatment on new intramammary infections [J].
Berry, EA ;
Hillerton, JE .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2002, 85 (01) :112-121
[2]   The use of a cephalonium containing dry cow therapy and an internal teat sealant, both alone and in combination [J].
Bradley, A. J. ;
Breen, J. E. ;
Payne, B. ;
Williams, P. ;
Green, M. J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (04) :1566-1577
[3]  
Breen J, 2017, SELECTIVE DRY COW WE
[4]   Understanding veterinarians' prescribing decisions on antibiotic dry cow therapy [J].
Higgins, H. M. ;
Golding, S. E. ;
Mouncey, J. ;
Nanjiani, I. ;
Cook, A. J. C. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2017, 100 (04) :2909-2916
[5]   Time to standardise dry cow therapy terminology [J].
Hillerton, Eric ;
Bryan, Mark ;
Biggs, Andrew ;
Berry, Elizabeth ;
Edmondson, Peter .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2017, 180 (12) :301-302
[6]   Evaluation of the efficacy of an internal teat sealer during the dry period [J].
Huxley, JN ;
Green, MJ ;
Green, LE ;
Bradley, AJ .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2002, 85 (03) :551-561
[7]   Factors affecting dairy farmers' attitudes towards antimicrobial medicine usage in cattle in England and Wales [J].
Jones, P. J. ;
Marier, E. A. ;
Tranter, R. B. ;
Wu, G. ;
Watson, E. ;
Teale, C. J. .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2015, 121 (1-2) :30-40
[8]   Improving bovine udder health: A national mastitis control program in the Netherlands [J].
Lam, T. J. G. M. ;
van den Borne, B. H. P. ;
Jansen, J. ;
Huijps, K. ;
van Veersen, J. C. L. ;
van Schaik, G. ;
Hogeveen, H. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2013, 96 (02) :1301-1311
[9]  
Reyher K. K, 2017, PRACTICE, V39, P63, DOI DOI 10.1136/INP.J341
[10]   Dairy farmers' perceptions toward the implementation of on-farm Johne's disease prevention and control strategies [J].
Ritter, C. ;
Jansen, J. ;
Roth, K. ;
Kastelic, J. P. ;
Adams, C. L. ;
Barkema, H. W. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (11) :9114-9125