Sub-muscular Breast Augmentation Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia

被引:29
作者
Bolletta, Alberto [1 ]
Dessy, Luca Andrea [2 ]
Fiorot, Luca [1 ]
Tronci, Alessio [3 ]
Rusciani, Antonio [2 ]
Ciudad, Pedro [4 ]
Trignano, Emilio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sassari, Plast Surg Unit, Dept Surg Microsurg & Med Sci, Via Monte Grappa 70, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cagliari, Anesthesia & Intens Care Unit, Cagliari, Italy
[4] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Breast augmentation; Sub-muscular; Tumescent local anesthesia; Breast implants; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; PROPOFOL; SURGERY; BLOCK;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-018-1181-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundTumescent local anesthesia (TLA) consists of infiltration of saline solution with lidocaine and epinephrine into the tissues to obtain regional anesthesia and vasoconstriction. The use of TLA in augmentation mammoplasty has been described for sub-glandular positioning. We describe a modified TLA technique for primary sub-muscular breast augmentation reporting our experience during the past 7years.MethodsFrom 2010 to 2017, 300 patients underwent bilateral primary sub-muscular breast augmentation under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution was prepared with 25mL of 2% lidocaine, 8mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1mL of epinephrine (1mg/1mL) in 1000mL of 0.9% saline solution. Firstly, the solution was infiltrated between the pectoral fascia and the mammary gland, secondarily, during surgery, under the pectoralis major muscle.ResultsThe average amount of tumescent solution infiltrated while performing TLA was 740mL per breast. No signs of adrenaline or lidocaine toxicity were reported and conversion to general anesthesia was never required. In all patients, no pain nor discomfort was reported during the pre-operating infiltration and surgical procedure. We reported a major complication rate of 3.3% (4 hematomas and 6 seromas) and a minor complication rate of 6.0% (8 implant dislocation and 10 dystrophic scars formation).ConclusionsTLA represents a safe and efficacious technique for performing breast augmentation surgery with sub-muscular implant positioning. This technique guarantees good pain control during and after surgery and has low incidence of postoperative side effects. Patients subjected to sub-muscular breast augmentation with TLA were satisfied.Level of Evidence IVThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 13
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   A retrospective analysis of 3,000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: Postoperative complications and associated factors [J].
Araco, A. ;
Gravante, G. ;
Araco, F. ;
Delogu, D. ;
Cervelli, V. ;
Walgenbach, K. .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 31 (05) :532-539
[2]   Usefulness of Intravenous Anesthesia Using a Target-controlled Infusion System with Local Anesthesia in Submuscular Breast Augmentation Surgery [J].
Chung, Kyu-Jin ;
Cha, Kyu-Ho ;
Lee, Jun-Ho ;
Kim, Yong-Ha ;
Kim, Tae-Gon ;
Kim, Il-Guk .
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2012, 39 (05) :540-545
[3]  
Cigna E, 2009, IN VIVO, V23, P983
[4]   Tumescent anaesthesia [J].
Conroy, Patrick H. ;
O'Rourke, James .
SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2013, 11 (04) :210-221
[5]   American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification [J].
Daabiss, Mohamed .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 55 (02) :111-115
[6]   Breast augmentation under general anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care - A retrospective comparative study [J].
Eldor, Liron ;
Weissman, Avi ;
Fodor, Lucian ;
Carmi, Nurit ;
Ullmann, Yehuida .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2008, 61 (03) :243-246
[7]   Augmentation Mammaplasty after Breast Enhancement with Macrolane [J].
Fallico, Nefer ;
Faenza, Mario ;
Dessy, Luca Andrea ;
Pili, Manuela ;
Trignano, Emilio .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (03) :439E-440E
[8]   Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane [J].
Fombeur, PO ;
Tilleul, PR ;
Beaussier, MJ ;
Lorente, C ;
Yazid, L ;
Lienhart, AH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2002, 59 (14) :1344-1350
[9]   Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: A systematic review [J].
Gupta, A ;
Stierer, T ;
Zuckerman, R ;
Sakima, N ;
Parker, SD ;
Fleisher, LA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (03) :632-641
[10]   Tumescent Analgesia in Plastic Surgery [J].
Gutowski, Karol A. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (04) :50S-57S