Explaining socioeconomic status effects in laryngeal cancer

被引:45
作者
Groome, PA
Schulze, KM
Keller, S
Mackillop, WJ
O'Sullivan, B
Irish, JC
Bissett, RJ
Dixon, PF
Eapen, LJ
Gulavita, SPP
Hammond, JA
Hodson, DI
Mackenzie, RG
Schneider, KM
Warde, PR
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Queens Canc Res Inst, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Canc Care Ontario, Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
access to care; laryngeal cancer; population-based; socioeconomic status; survival;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2005.12.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: People with lower socioeconomic status (SES) experience shorter survival times after a cancer diagnosis for many disease sites. We determined whether area-level SES was associated with the outcomes: cause-specific survival and local-regional failure in laryngeal cancer in Ontario, Canada. When we found an association we sought explanations that might be related to access to care including age, sex, rural residence, tumor stage, lymph node status, use of diagnostic imaging, treatment type, percentage of prescribed radiotherapy delivered, number of radiotherapy interruption days, treatment waiting time, and treating cancer center. Materials and methods: The study population consisted of 661 glottic and 495 supraglottic stage-stratified randomly-sampled patients identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Area-level SES quintiles were assigned using adjusted median household income from the Canadian Census. Other data were collected from patient charts. Explanations for SES effects were determined by measuring whether the effect moved toward the null value by at least 10% when an access indicator was added to a the model. Results: Socioeconomic status was not related to either outcome for those with supraglottic cancer, but an association was present in glottic cancer. With the highest socioeconomic status quintile as the referent group, the relative risks for patients in the lowest socioeconomic quintile were 2.75 (95% Cl 1.482 5.12) for cause-specific survival and 1.90 (95% Cl 1.242 2.93) for local-regional failure. Disease stage as measured by T-category explained between 3% and 23% of these socioeconomic effects. None of the other access indicators met our 10% change criterion. Conclusion: We question why people in lower socioeconomic quintiles were not diagnosed earlier in the disease progression. Having ruled out several variables that may be related to access to care, additional biologic and social variables should be examined to further understand socioeconomic status effects.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 292
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Distance Traveled to Head and Neck Cancer Provider: A Measure of Socioeconomic Status and Access
    Massa, Sean T.
    Liebendorfer, Adam P.
    Zevallos, Jose P.
    Mazul, Angela L.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2020, 162 (02) : 193 - 203
  • [42] Aritenoid movility impact in nodal status in laryngeal cancer
    Francisco Gallegos-Hernandez, Jose
    GACETA MEXICANA DE ONCOLOGIA, 2011, 10 (04): : 197 - 200
  • [43] The effect of socioeconomic status on health-care delay and treatment of esophageal cancer
    Wang, Nana
    Cao, Fangli
    Liu, Fang
    Jia, Yibin
    Wang, Jianbo
    Bao, Cihang
    Wang, Xintong
    Song, Qingxu
    Tan, Bingxu
    Cheng, Yufeng
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2015, 13
  • [44] Socioeconomic status and quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer
    Tribius, S.
    Meyer, M. S.
    Pflug, C.
    Hanken, H.
    Busch, C. -J.
    Kruell, A.
    Petersen, C.
    Bergelt, C.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2018, 194 (08) : 737 - 749
  • [45] Population analysis of socioeconomic status and otolaryngologist distribution on head and neck cancer outcomes
    Pagedar, Nitin A.
    Davis, Andrew B.
    Sperry, Steven M.
    Charlton, Mary E.
    Lynch, Charles F.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2019, 41 (04): : 1046 - 1052
  • [46] The Association of Race/Ethnicity, Insurance Status, and Socioeconomic Factors With Breast Cancer Care
    Freedman, Rachel A.
    Virgo, Katherine S.
    He, Yulei
    Pavluck, Alexandre L.
    Winer, Eric P.
    Ward, Elizabeth M.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (01) : 180 - 189
  • [47] Impact of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Psychologic Outcomes in Childhood Cancer Patients and Caregivers
    Ramsey, Logan H.
    Graves, Patricia E.
    Sharp, Katianne M. Howard
    Seals, Samantha R.
    Collier, Anderson B.
    Karlson, Cynthia W.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 41 (06) : 433 - 437
  • [48] Impact of educational differences as measure of socioeconomic status on survival for breast cancer patients
    Nowara, Elzbieta
    Suwinski, Rafal
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2012, 16 (04): : 345 - 349
  • [49] Socioeconomic status and survival in glioblastoma
    Trikalinos, Nikolaos A.
    Kwok, Young
    Goloubeva, Olga
    Mehta, Minesh
    Sausville, Edward
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (02): : 4131 - 4136
  • [50] Survival after acute lymphocytic leukaemia: effects of socioeconomic status and geographic region
    Schillinger, JA
    Grosclaude, PC
    Honjo, S
    Quinn, MJ
    Sloggett, A
    Coleman, MP
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1999, 80 (04) : 311 - 317