Explaining socioeconomic status effects in laryngeal cancer

被引:45
作者
Groome, PA
Schulze, KM
Keller, S
Mackillop, WJ
O'Sullivan, B
Irish, JC
Bissett, RJ
Dixon, PF
Eapen, LJ
Gulavita, SPP
Hammond, JA
Hodson, DI
Mackenzie, RG
Schneider, KM
Warde, PR
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Queens Canc Res Inst, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Canc Care Ontario, Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
access to care; laryngeal cancer; population-based; socioeconomic status; survival;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2005.12.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: People with lower socioeconomic status (SES) experience shorter survival times after a cancer diagnosis for many disease sites. We determined whether area-level SES was associated with the outcomes: cause-specific survival and local-regional failure in laryngeal cancer in Ontario, Canada. When we found an association we sought explanations that might be related to access to care including age, sex, rural residence, tumor stage, lymph node status, use of diagnostic imaging, treatment type, percentage of prescribed radiotherapy delivered, number of radiotherapy interruption days, treatment waiting time, and treating cancer center. Materials and methods: The study population consisted of 661 glottic and 495 supraglottic stage-stratified randomly-sampled patients identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Area-level SES quintiles were assigned using adjusted median household income from the Canadian Census. Other data were collected from patient charts. Explanations for SES effects were determined by measuring whether the effect moved toward the null value by at least 10% when an access indicator was added to a the model. Results: Socioeconomic status was not related to either outcome for those with supraglottic cancer, but an association was present in glottic cancer. With the highest socioeconomic status quintile as the referent group, the relative risks for patients in the lowest socioeconomic quintile were 2.75 (95% Cl 1.482 5.12) for cause-specific survival and 1.90 (95% Cl 1.242 2.93) for local-regional failure. Disease stage as measured by T-category explained between 3% and 23% of these socioeconomic effects. None of the other access indicators met our 10% change criterion. Conclusion: We question why people in lower socioeconomic quintiles were not diagnosed earlier in the disease progression. Having ruled out several variables that may be related to access to care, additional biologic and social variables should be examined to further understand socioeconomic status effects.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 292
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current Status of Partial Laryngeal Surgery for Advanced Laryngeal Cancer: When and Why?
    Crosetti, Erika
    Fantini, Marco
    Bertotto, Ilaria
    Bertolin, Andy
    Arrigoni, Giulia
    Lorenzi, Andrea
    Succo, Giovanni
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 26 (06) : 614 - 624
  • [32] Socioeconomic status and lung cancer risk in Canada
    Mao, Y
    Hu, JF
    Ugnat, AM
    Semenciw, R
    Fincham, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (04) : 809 - 817
  • [33] Socioeconomic status and survival of gastric cancer patients
    Fontana, V
    Decensi, A
    Orengo, MA
    Parodi, S
    Torrisi, R
    Puntoni, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (04) : 537 - 542
  • [34] The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on the Breast Cancer Journey
    Nafisha Lalani
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2011, 26 (1) : 200 - 201
  • [35] Laryngeal Cancer: Global Socioeconomic Trends in Disease Burden and Smoking Habits
    Ramsey, Tam
    Guo, Eric
    Svider, Peter F.
    Lin, Hosheng
    Syeda, Sara
    Raza, S. Naweed
    Fribley, Andrew M.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2018, 128 (09) : 2039 - 2043
  • [36] Modeling Socioeconomic Status Effects on Language Development
    Thomas, Michael S. C.
    Forrester, Neil A.
    Ronald, Angelica
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 49 (12) : 2325 - 2343
  • [37] Effects of Socioeconomic Status and Fairness on Salivary Cortisol
    Michael, Jaeschke Johannes Paul
    Primes, Georg
    Windhager, Sonja
    Fieder, Martin
    Wallner, Bernard
    EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 14 (02): : 1 - 10
  • [38] Does Socioeconomic Status Affect Stage at Presentation for Larynx Cancer in Canada's Universal Health Care System?
    Khalil, Diana
    Corsten, Martin J.
    Holland, Margaret
    Balram, Adele
    McDonald, James Ted
    Johnson-Obaseki, Stephanie
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2019, 160 (03) : 488 - 493
  • [39] Incidence of head and neck cancer and socioeconomic status in Canada from 1992 to 2007
    Hwang, Euna
    Johnson-Obaseki, Stephanie
    McDonald, James Ted
    Connell, Chris
    Corsten, Martin
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 49 (11) : 1072 - 1076
  • [40] Socioeconomic Status and Ovarian Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: A Study Nested Within UKCTOCS
    Karpinskyj, Chloe
    Burnell, Matthew
    Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Arturo
    Ryan, Andy
    Kalsi, Jatinderpal
    Jacobs, Ian
    Parmar, Max
    Menon, Usha
    Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (02)