Explaining socioeconomic status effects in laryngeal cancer

被引:45
作者
Groome, PA
Schulze, KM
Keller, S
Mackillop, WJ
O'Sullivan, B
Irish, JC
Bissett, RJ
Dixon, PF
Eapen, LJ
Gulavita, SPP
Hammond, JA
Hodson, DI
Mackenzie, RG
Schneider, KM
Warde, PR
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Queens Canc Res Inst, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Canc Care Ontario, Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
access to care; laryngeal cancer; population-based; socioeconomic status; survival;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2005.12.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: People with lower socioeconomic status (SES) experience shorter survival times after a cancer diagnosis for many disease sites. We determined whether area-level SES was associated with the outcomes: cause-specific survival and local-regional failure in laryngeal cancer in Ontario, Canada. When we found an association we sought explanations that might be related to access to care including age, sex, rural residence, tumor stage, lymph node status, use of diagnostic imaging, treatment type, percentage of prescribed radiotherapy delivered, number of radiotherapy interruption days, treatment waiting time, and treating cancer center. Materials and methods: The study population consisted of 661 glottic and 495 supraglottic stage-stratified randomly-sampled patients identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Area-level SES quintiles were assigned using adjusted median household income from the Canadian Census. Other data were collected from patient charts. Explanations for SES effects were determined by measuring whether the effect moved toward the null value by at least 10% when an access indicator was added to a the model. Results: Socioeconomic status was not related to either outcome for those with supraglottic cancer, but an association was present in glottic cancer. With the highest socioeconomic status quintile as the referent group, the relative risks for patients in the lowest socioeconomic quintile were 2.75 (95% Cl 1.482 5.12) for cause-specific survival and 1.90 (95% Cl 1.242 2.93) for local-regional failure. Disease stage as measured by T-category explained between 3% and 23% of these socioeconomic effects. None of the other access indicators met our 10% change criterion. Conclusion: We question why people in lower socioeconomic quintiles were not diagnosed earlier in the disease progression. Having ruled out several variables that may be related to access to care, additional biologic and social variables should be examined to further understand socioeconomic status effects.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 292
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Stage at Presentation of Laryngeal Cancer in the United States
    Lebo, Nicole L.
    Khalil, Diana
    Balram, Adele
    Holland, Margaret
    Corsten, Martin
    McDonald, James Ted
    Johnson-Obaseki, Stephanie
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2019, 161 (05) : 800 - 806
  • [2] Socioeconomic status and breast cancer treatment
    Dreyer, Marie S.
    Nattinger, Ann B.
    McGinley, Emily L.
    Pezzin, Liliana E.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 167 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [3] Breast Cancer and Socioeconomic Status in Austria
    Kunze, Ursula
    Boehm, Gabriela
    BREAST CARE, 2009, 4 (04) : 263 - 267
  • [4] The role of psychosocial processes in explaining the gradient between socioeconomic status and health
    Adler, NE
    Snibbe, AC
    CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 12 (04) : 119 - 123
  • [5] Socioeconomic status and epithelial ovarian cancer survival in Sweden
    Weiderpass, Elisabete
    Oh, Jin-Kyoung
    Algeri, Sara
    Bellocco, Rino
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2014, 25 (08) : 1063 - 1073
  • [6] Socioeconomic status and epithelial ovarian cancer survival in Sweden
    Elisabete Weiderpass
    Jin-Kyoung Oh
    Sara Algeri
    Rino Bellocco
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2014, 25 : 1063 - 1073
  • [7] Effects of socioeconomic status on enrollment in clinical trials for cancer: A systematic review
    Donzo, Maja Wichhart
    Nguyen, Grace
    Nemeth, John K.
    Owoc, Maryanna S.
    Mady, Leila J.
    Chen, Amy Y.
    Schmitt, Nicole C.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01):
  • [8] Combined Effects of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Cancer Beliefs, Cognitions, and Emotions
    Assari, Shervin
    Khoshpouri, Pegah
    Chalian, Hamid
    HEALTHCARE, 2019, 7 (01)
  • [9] Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Alzheimer Disease Mortality in Taiwan
    Chen, Nai-Ching
    Liang, Chih-Kuang
    Yin, Chun-Hao
    Lin, Yu-Te
    Lee, Ching-Chih
    Chen, Chien-Liang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 28 (02) : 205 - 216
  • [10] Understanding the effects of socioeconomic status along the breast cancer continuum in Australian women: a systematic review of evidence
    Lyle, Greg
    Hendrie, Gilly A.
    Hendrie, Delia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2017, 16