How will the Chinese Certified Emission Reduction scheme save cost for the national carbon trading system?

被引:80
作者
Li, Lixu [1 ]
Ye, Fei [1 ]
Li, Yina [1 ]
Chang, Ching-Ter [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Informat Management, 259 Wen Hwa 1st Rd, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Dept Thorac Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Ming Chi Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Emissions trading scheme; Chinese certified emission reduction scheme; Abatement costs; Declaration costs; Offset rate; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; ALLOCATION; EFFICIENCY; IMPACTS; ELECTRICITY; BENEFITS; QUALITY; DESIGN; MARKET; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.100
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As an important supplementary mechanism to the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), the Chinese Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) scheme is of profound significance for achieving low-cost emission reduction and renewable energy goal. However, limited literature discusses the role of the CCER scheme. To explore to what extent will the CCER scheme save cost for China's carbon trading system, this paper establishes a two-level decision sub-game led by the national government and compares the cost-saving effect before and after introducing the CCER scheme. The empirical results from China confirm the cost-saving effect of the CCER scheme while achieving the homogeneity and equivalence of carbon emission quotas and CCER quotas are the prerequisite for the minimum national aggregate costs. The equilibrium CCER trading price is linked to three factors, including the offset rate of CCER quotas, the total carbon emission quotas and the reciprocal of the declaration cost coefficient. Depending on the actual situation in China, the ceiling offset rate of CCER quotas should not exceed 6%. Even so, the national government still needs to clarify the potential provinces and direction of CCER projects to ensure that the actual offset rate could be as close as possible to the optimal value. These findings can provide guidance for policy makers in the design of the national carbon trading system.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 109
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey
    Agrali, Semra
    Uctug, Fehmi Gorkem
    Turkmen, Burcin Atilgan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 215 : 305 - 315
  • [2] How much carbon offsetting and where? Implications of efficiency, effectiveness, and ethicality considerations for public opinion formation
    Anderson, Brile
    Bernauer, Thomas
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 94 : 387 - 395
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, CDM project activities
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, 13 5 YEAR PLAN NAT E
  • [5] [Anonymous], 13 5 YEAR PLAN CONTR
  • [6] CSR as a legitimatizing tool in carbon market: Evidence from Latin America's Clean Development Mechanism
    Benites-Lazaro, L. L.
    Mello-Thery, N. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 149 : 218 - 226
  • [7] CCTN [China Carbon Trading Network], 2017, REN EN SUPPL SEIZ PR
  • [8] CCTN [China Carbon Trading Network], 2014, DIFF CCER CDM PROJ
  • [9] CCTN [China Carbon Trading Network], 2017, ENC US CCER QUOT PRO
  • [10] Taiwan's renewable energy strategy and energy-intensive industrial policy
    Chang, Ching-Ter
    Lee, Hsing-Chen
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 64 : 456 - 465