Conversion of epidural labour analgesia to anaesthesia for Caesarean section: a prospective study of the incidence and determinants of failure

被引:46
作者
Halpern, S. H. [1 ]
Soliman, A. [1 ]
Yee, J. [1 ]
Angle, P. [1 ]
Ioscovich, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
[2] Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
anaesthesia; obstetric; anaesthetic techniques; epidural; analgesic techniques; extradural; analgesia; Caesarean section; PINPRICK; EFFICACY; DELIVERY; COLD;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aen352
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The incidence of general anaesthesia (GA) has been used as a marker for the quality of obstetric anaesthesia care. Recent guidelines suggest the rate of GA for Caesarean section in parturients with pre-existing epidural analgesia for labour should be <3%. The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether or not this is an achievable standard in a university teaching hospital. We also wished to determine the factors influencing the incidence of inadequate anaesthesia. Methods. We studied a consecutive cohort of 501 patients who had a Caesarean section after epidural labour analgesia. The incidence of GA, the total incidence of failure, and the factors previously associated with failure were recorded. Factors shown to be significant with univariate analysis were used in a binary logistic regression to determine the independent risk factors for failure. Results. Twenty-one of 501 parturients required GA (4.1%, 95% confidence interval 2.6-6.3%), not significantly different from 3% (P=0.1). Fifteen of 21 (71%) of these occurred intraoperatively. The total rate of failure was 30/501 (5.9%, 95% confidence interval 4.0-8.4%). Maternal height and the number of clinician top-ups in labour were the significant independent risk factors for failure. Conclusions. Intraoperative conversion to GA may increase both maternal and fetal risks. Strategies to reduce the incidence may include early recognition of inadequate labour analgesia and reliable assessment of adequacy of surgical anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 243
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Sensory assessment of epidural block for Caesarean section: a systematic comparison of pinprick, cold and touch sensation [J].
Camorcia, M ;
Capogna, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (07) :611-617
[2]  
CAMPBELL DC, 2005, ANESTHESIOLOGY S, V102, pA35
[3]  
LEE SY, 2007, REG ANESTH PAIN ME S, V32, P7
[4]   Extending low-dose epidural analgesia for emergency Caesarean section - A comparison of three solutions [J].
Lucas, DN ;
Ciccone, GK ;
Yentis, SM .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (12) :1173-1177
[5]   Extending low-dose epidural analgesia in labour for emergency Caesarean section - a comparison of levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl [J].
Malhotra, S. ;
Yentis, S. M. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 62 (07) :667-671
[6]   Are combined spinal-epidural catheters reliable? [J].
Norris, MC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2000, 9 (01) :3-6
[7]   Risk factors for failure to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section [J].
Orbach-Zinger, S. ;
Friedman, L. ;
Avramovich, A. ;
Ilgiaeva, N. ;
Orvieto, R. ;
Sulkes, J. ;
Eidelman, L. A. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 50 (08) :1014-1018
[8]  
Price M L, 1991, Int J Obstet Anesth, V1, P13, DOI 10.1016/0959-289X(91)90024-K
[9]   Epidural catheter function during labor predicts anesthetic efficacy for subsequent cesarean delivery [J].
Riley, ET ;
Papasin, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2002, 11 (02) :81-84
[10]  
Ross Brian K, 2003, Anesthesiol Clin North Am, V21, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0889-8537(02)00051-2