Quantification of Experienced Hearing Problems With Item Response Theory

被引:9
作者
Chenault, Michelene [1 ,2 ]
Berger, Martijn [2 ]
Kremer, Bernd [1 ]
Anteunis, Lucien [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
item response theory; graded response model; hearing screening; patient journey; patient-reported; outcomes; COMMUNICATION PROFILE; SCALES;
D O I
10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0038)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to improve the effectiveness of adult hearing screens and demonstrate that interventions assessment methods are needed that address the individual's experienced hearing. Item response theory, which provides a methodology for assessing patient-reported outcomes, is examined here to demonstrate its usefulness in hearing screens and interventions. Method: The graded response model is applied to a scale of 11 items assessing perceived hearing functioning and 10 items assessing experienced social limitations completed by a sample of 212 persons age 55+ years. Fixed and variable slope models are compared. Discrimination and threshold parameters are estimated and information functions evaluated. Results: Variable slope models for both scales provided the best fit. The estimated discrimination parameters for all items except for one in each scale were good if not excellent (1.5-3.4). Threshold values varied, demonstrating the complementary and supplementary value of items within a scale. The information provided by each item varies relative to trait values so that each scale of items provides information over a wider range of trait values. Conclusion: Item response theory methodology facilitates the comparison of items relative to their discriminative ability and information provided and thus provides a basis for the selection of items for application in a screening setting.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 262
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] AN ITEM RESPONSE THEORY ANALYSIS OF THE GENERAL AND ACADEMIC SCALES OF THE SELF-DESCRIPTION QUESTIONNAIRE-II
    FLANNERY, WP
    REISE, SP
    WIDAMAN, KF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1995, 29 (02) : 168 - 188
  • [12] Development of the Hearing Attitudes in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (HARQ)
    Hallam, RS
    Brooks, DN
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 1996, 30 (03): : 199 - 213
  • [13] Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study
    Hays, Ron D.
    Liu, Honghu
    Spritzer, Karen
    Cella, David
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) : S32 - S38
  • [14] A GENERAL APPROACH TO CONFIRMATORY MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FACTOR ANALYSIS
    JORESKOG, KG
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1969, 34 (2P1) : 183 - &
  • [15] EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON BETWEEN FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL ITEM RESPONSE MODELS
    KNOL, DL
    BERGER, MPF
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1991, 26 (03) : 457 - 477
  • [16] The patient journey of adults with hearing impairment: the patients' views
    Manchaiah, V. K. C.
    Stephens, D.
    Meredith, R.
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2011, 36 (03) : 227 - 234
  • [17] GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDEXES IN CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS - THE EFFECT OF SAMPLE-SIZE
    MARSH, HW
    BALLA, JR
    MCDONALD, RP
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) : 391 - 410
  • [18] Improving the Quality and Applicability of the Dutch Scales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired Using Item Response Theory
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    Knol, Dirk L.
    van Nispen, Ruth M. A.
    Kramer, Sophia E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2010, 53 (03): : 556 - 571
  • [19] Applying item response theory to enhance health outcomes assessment
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Hays, Ron D.
    Chang, Chih-Hung
    Perfetto, Eleanor M.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (Suppl 1) : 1 - 3
  • [20] Rupp A., 2003, International Journal of Testing, V3, P365, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327574IJT0304_5