Quantification of Experienced Hearing Problems With Item Response Theory

被引:9
作者
Chenault, Michelene [1 ,2 ]
Berger, Martijn [2 ]
Kremer, Bernd [1 ]
Anteunis, Lucien [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
item response theory; graded response model; hearing screening; patient journey; patient-reported; outcomes; COMMUNICATION PROFILE; SCALES;
D O I
10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0038)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to improve the effectiveness of adult hearing screens and demonstrate that interventions assessment methods are needed that address the individual's experienced hearing. Item response theory, which provides a methodology for assessing patient-reported outcomes, is examined here to demonstrate its usefulness in hearing screens and interventions. Method: The graded response model is applied to a scale of 11 items assessing perceived hearing functioning and 10 items assessing experienced social limitations completed by a sample of 212 persons age 55+ years. Fixed and variable slope models are compared. Discrimination and threshold parameters are estimated and information functions evaluated. Results: Variable slope models for both scales provided the best fit. The estimated discrimination parameters for all items except for one in each scale were good if not excellent (1.5-3.4). Threshold values varied, demonstrating the complementary and supplementary value of items within a scale. The information provided by each item varies relative to trait values so that each scale of items provides information over a wider range of trait values. Conclusion: Item response theory methodology facilitates the comparison of items relative to their discriminative ability and information provided and thus provides a basis for the selection of items for application in a screening setting.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 262
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, LISREL 8 7 WINDOWS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, Handbook of modern item response theory, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1986, Introduction to classical and modern test theory
  • [4] Baker F. B., 1985, BASICS ITEM RESPONSE
  • [5] BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • [6] Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models
    Davis, A.
    Smith, P.
    Ferguson, M.
    Stephens, D.
    Gianopoulos, I.
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2007, 11 (42) : 1 - +
  • [7] Development of the Screening Test for Hearing Problems
    Demorest, Marilyn E.
    Wark, David J.
    Erdman, Sue Ann
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2011, 20 (02) : 100 - 110
  • [8] DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMUNICATION PROFILE FOR THE HEARING-IMPAIRED
    DEMOREST, ME
    ERDMAN, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1987, 52 (02): : 129 - 143
  • [9] Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement
    Edelen, Maria Orlando
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (Suppl 1) : 5 - 18
  • [10] Applying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: the challenges for health outcomes assessment
    Fayers, Peter M.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 : 187 - 194