Absolute percentage of biopsied tissue positive for Gleason pattern 4 disease (APP4) appears predictive of disease control after high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer

被引:9
作者
Martell, K. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Mendez, L. C. [1 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Chung, H. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Tseng, C. L. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Zhang, L. [2 ]
Alayed, Y. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Liu, S. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Vesprini, D. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Chu, W. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Paudel, M. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Cheung, P. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Szumacher, E. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Ravi, A. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Loblaw, A. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Morton, G. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, London, ON, Canada
[4] London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
[5] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Div Radiat Oncol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[6] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
Brachytherapy; Prostate; Gleason; Pathology; Outcomes; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; GRADE; SCORE; RECURRENCE; THERAPY; SYSTEM; MODEL; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To identify if, in intermediate risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa), the absolute percentage of biopsied tissue positive for pattern 4 disease (APP4) may be a predictor of outcome. Materials and methods: 411 patients with IR-PCa were retrospectively reviewed. APP4 was calculated based on biopsy reports. Multivariable competing risk analysis was then performed on optimized APP4 cutpoints to predict for biochemical failure (BF), androgen deprivation use for BF (ADT-BF) and development of metastases (MD). Results: Median follow-up for the cohort was 5.2 (Inter Quartile Range: 2.9-6.6) years. Median baseline PSA was 7.3 (5.3-9.8) ng/mL. 234 (56.9%) patients had T1 and 177 (43.1%) had T2 disease. Median APP4 was 2.00 (0.75-7.50)%. 38 (9.3%) patients experienced BF. The optimal cutpoint of APP4 for BF was >3.3% with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66. 17 (4.1%) received ADT-BF. The ADT-BF cutpoint was >6.6% with an AUC of 0.72. Eight (2.0%) developed MD. The MD cutpoint was >17.5% with an AUC of 0.86. Using APP4 >3.3 vs <= 3.3, log-transformed baseline PSA ln(PSA) (HR 2.5, 1.1-6.1; p = 0.037) and APP4 (HR 2.3, 1.1-4.7; p = 0.031) predicted for BF. Using APP4 >6.6 vs <= 6.6, ln(PSA) (HR 4.2, 1.4-12.4; p = 0.010) and APP4 (HR 3.7, 1.4-10.0; p = 0.009) were predictive of ADT-BF. APP4 >17.5 vs <= 17.5 alone was predictive of MD (HR 25.7, 4.9-135.3; p < 0.001). Conclusion: APP4 cutpoints of >3.3%, >6.6% and >17.5% were strongly associated with increased risk of BF, ADT-BF and developing MD respectively. These findings may inform future practice when treating IR-PCa but require external validation. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 177
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, SURVIVAL ANAL USING
  • [2] Effect of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation against Screening for Prostate Cancer on Incident Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in the United States
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Mallin, Katherine
    Graves, Amy J.
    Penson, David F.
    Palis, Bryan
    Winchester, David P.
    Chang, Sam S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (06) : 1587 - 1593
  • [3] Expanded risk groups help determine which prostate radiotherapy sub-group may benefit from adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy
    Beasley, Matthew
    Williams, Scott G.
    Pickles, Tom
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2008, 3 (1)
  • [4] Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and 5 predicts survival after radical prostatectomy
    Cheng, Liang
    Davidson, Darrell D.
    Lin, Haiqun
    Koch, Michael O.
    [J]. CANCER, 2007, 110 (09) : 1967 - 1972
  • [5] Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy
    Choy, Bonnie
    Pearce, Shane M.
    Anderson, Blake B.
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Zagaja, Gregory
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Paner, Gladell P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (10) : 1400 - 1406
  • [6] Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence
    Cole, Adam I.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Palapattu, Ganesh S.
    He, Chang
    Tomlins, Scott A.
    Weizer, Alon Z.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Wu, Angela
    Siddiqui, Javed
    Chinnaiyan, Arul M.
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    Kunju, Lakshmi P.
    Miller, David C.
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Wei, John T.
    Mehra, Rohit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02) : 405 - 411
  • [7] The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Karnes, Robert Jeffrey
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Stabile, Armando
    Moschini, Marco
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Zaffuto, Emanuele
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2017, 77 (03) : 263 - 273
  • [8] A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Egevad, Lars
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Parwani, Anil V.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Wiklund, Peter
    Han, Misop
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Klein, Eric A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 428 - 435
  • [9] An Update of the Gleason Grading System
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) : 433 - 440
  • [10] Prostate Cancer Screening and the Goldilocks Principle: How Much Is Just Right?
    Faiena, Izak
    Holden, Stuart
    Cooperberg, Mathew R.
    Holden, Stuart
    Soule, Howard R.
    Simons, Jonathan W.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Penson, David F.
    Morgans, Alicia K.
    Hussain, Maha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (10) : 937 - +