Modelling Grid Constraints in a Multi-Energy Municipal Energy System Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation

被引:2
作者
Kriechbaum, Lukas [1 ]
Gradl, Philipp [1 ]
Reichenhauser, Romeo [1 ]
Kienberger, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leoben, Energy Network Technol, Franz Josef Str 18, A-8700 Leoben, Austria
关键词
energy systems optimisation; exergy analysis; multi-energy systems; energy-system design; municipal energy systems; cumulative-exergy consumption minimisation; optimal power flow; OPTIMAL POWER-FLOW; NATURAL-GAS; ELECTRICITY; REANALYSIS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.3390/en13153900
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Efficiency measures and the integration of renewable energy sources are key to achieving a sustainable society. The cumulative exergy consumption describes the resource consumption of a product from the raw material to the final utilisation. It includes the exergy expenses for energy infrastructure as well as the imported energy. Since consumers and renewable potentials are usually in different locations, grid restrictions and energy flows have a significant impact on the optimal energy system design. In this paper we will use cumulative exergy minimisation together with load flow calculations to determine the optimal system design of a multi-cell municipal energy system. Two different load flow representations are compared. The network flow model uses transmission efficiencies for heat, gas and electricity flows. The power flow representation uses a linear DC approximated load flow for electricity flows and a MILP (mixed integer linear programming) representation for heat and gas flows to account for the nonlinear pressure loss relation. Although both representations provide comparable overall results, the installed capacities in the individual cells differ significantly. The differences are greatest in well meshed cells, while they are small in stub lines.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PROBAS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Key world energy statistics 2017
[3]  
Asmus P., 2010, Electr. J, V23, P72, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2010.11.001
[4]   Comparison of two metaheuristics with mathematical programming methods for the solution of OPF [J].
Biskas, PN ;
Ziogos, NP ;
Tellidou, A ;
Zournas, CE ;
Bakirtzis, AG ;
Petridis, V .
IEE PROCEEDINGS-GENERATION TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION, 2006, 153 (01) :16-24
[5]  
Bockl B., 2016, 14 S EN P EN UNS EUR
[6]   HyFlowA Hybrid Load Flow-Modelling Framework to Evaluate the Effects of Energy Storage and Sector Coupling on the Electrical Load Flows [J].
Boeckl, Benjamin ;
Greiml, Matthias ;
Leitner, Lukas ;
Pichler, Patrick ;
Kriechbaum, Lukas ;
Kienberger, Thomas .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (05)
[7]   A mathematical model for the optimal operation of the University of Genoa Smart Polygeneration Microgrid: Evaluation of technical, economic and environmental performance indicators [J].
Bracco, Stefano ;
Delfino, Federico ;
Pampararo, Fabio ;
Robba, Michela ;
Rossi, Mansueto .
ENERGY, 2014, 64 :912-922
[8]   An exergy analysis for Milano smart city [J].
Causone, Francesco ;
Sangalli, Andrea ;
Pagliano, Lorenzo ;
Carlucci, Salvatore .
8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, SEB-16, 2017, 111 :877-886
[9]   Exergy: Its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology [J].
Dewulf, Jo ;
Van Langenhove, Herman ;
Muys, Bart ;
Bruers, Stun ;
Bakshi, Bhavik R. ;
Grubb, Geoffrey F. ;
Paulus, D. M. ;
Sciubba, Enrico .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (07) :2221-2232
[10]   Nodal, uniform, or zonal pricing: Distribution of economic surplus [J].
Ding, F ;
Fuller, JD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (02) :875-882