Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass utilization for electricity generation in the European Union and the United States

被引:66
|
作者
Beagle, E. [1 ]
Belmont, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Mech Engn, 1000 E Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Greenhouse gases (GHG); Biomass Co-firing; Co-combustion; Coal; EXPORTED WOOD PELLETS; FIRED POWER-PLANTS; BIOENERGY PRODUCTION; ENERGY; CHAINS; COST; LOGISTICS; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Biomass utilization is a strategy to decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the European Union (EU) but bioenergy in the United States (US) is currently limited. As a result, biomass is increasingly exported from the US to the EU, but changes to the policy landscape are poised to alter this. This study utilizes Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to assess impacts of biomass transportation on bioenergy life cycle GHG emissions. Transportation modes considered include truck, train and sea freight and each are assessed at realistic distances expected in bioenergy supply chains. Emissions for biomass firing alone and co-firing with coal using wood chips and pellets are compared to a baseline coal-fired power plant. Results include life cycle emissions for each case, and sensitivity analysis is presented for variation in power plant efficiency and biomass heating value. A generalized model for estimation of bioenergy emissions is presented. In nearly all cases, biomass utilization for electricity production produces lower life cycle GHG emissions compared to the coal baseline, with emission reductions as high as 76%. Utilization in the US and EU have similar overall emissions at long US distances. Policy implications are discussed in the context of current US and EU policies.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 275
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARATIVE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF BIOMASS UTILIZATION FOR ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES
    Beagle, E.
    Belmont, E.
    PAPERS OF THE 25TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE, 2017, : 1498 - 1510
  • [2] Life-cycle impact assessment of renewable electricity generation systems in the United States
    Mahmud, M. A. Parvez
    Huda, Nazmul
    Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan
    Lang, Candace
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 151 : 1028 - 1045
  • [3] The Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Power Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass
    Shen, Xinhua
    Kommalapati, Raghava R.
    Huque, Ziaul
    Sustainability, 2015, 7 (10): : 12974 - 12987
  • [4] Life cycle assessment applied to electricity generation from renewable biomass
    Perilhon, C.
    Alkadee, D.
    Descombes, G.
    Lacour, S.
    TERRAGREEN 2012: CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT (CESSE), 2012, 18 : 165 - 176
  • [5] Comparative Social Life Cycle Assessment of Two Biomass-to-Electricity Systems
    Martin-Gamboa, Mario
    Quinteiro, Paula
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    Iribarren, Diego
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (09)
  • [6] Comparative life cycle assessment of electricity generation by different wind turbine types
    Schreiber, Andrea
    Marx, Josefine
    Zapp, Petra
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 : 561 - 572
  • [7] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF BRIQUETTE PRODUCTION FROM RICE STRAW AND ITS UTILIZATION AS A FUEL FOR ELECTRICITY GENERATION
    Intanoo, Patcharee
    Wongchina, Sudaphon
    SURANAREE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04):
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in Mexico
    Santoyo-Castelazo, E.
    Gujba, H.
    Azapagic, A.
    ENERGY, 2011, 36 (03) : 1488 - 1499
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in Mauritius
    Brizmohun, Ravina
    Ramjeawon, Toolseeram
    Azapagic, Adisa
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 106 : 565 - 575
  • [10] Comparative life cycle assessment of aquaponics and hydroponics in the Midwestern United States
    Chen, Peng
    Zhu, Gaotian
    Kim, Hye-Ji
    Brown, Paul B.
    Huang, Jen-Yi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 275