Patient-controlled versus scheduled, nurse-administered analgesia following vaginal reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial

被引:20
作者
Crisp, Catrina C. [1 ]
Bandi, Sindura
Kleeman, Steven D.
Oakley, Susan H.
Vaccaro, Christine M.
Estanol, Maria V.
Fellner, Angela N. [2 ]
Pauls, Rachel N.
机构
[1] Good Samaritan Hosp, Cincinnati Urogynecol Associates, Div Urogynecol & Pelv Reconstruct Surg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cincinnati, OH 45220 USA
[2] Good Samaritan Hosp, E Kenneth Hatton Inst Res & Educ, Cincinnati, OH 45220 USA
关键词
intravenous analgesia; pain control; patient-controlled analgesia (PCA); postoperative analgesia; vaginal surgery; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; PAIN; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.040
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patient-controlled analgesia or scheduled intravenous analgesia provides superior pain relief and satisfaction with pain control after vaginal reconstructive surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-nine women scheduled for vaginal reconstructive surgery were enrolled in this randomized trial. Operative procedures and postoperative orders were standardized. Visual analog scales for pain and satisfaction with pain control were recorded during the hospital stay and 2 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia had less pain on postoperative day 1, 25 mm vs 39 mm, on visual analog scales (P = .007). Although this group used twice as much hydromorphone (3.57 mg vs 1.48 mg, P < .001), there was no difference in side effects, length of hospital stay, or complications. For the sample overall, larger amounts of narcotic used correlated with higher pain scores (r = 0.364, P = .009) and worse satisfaction scores (r = -0.348, P = .012). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing vaginal surgery, patient-controlled analgesia offers superior pain relief on postoperative day 1 when compared with scheduled, nurse-administered hydromorphone.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Comparison of satisfaction and pain relief between patients-controlled analgesia and interval analgesia after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy [J].
Bayar, Uelkue ;
Basaran, Mustafa ;
Atasoy, Nuray ;
Ayoglu, Hilal ;
Sade, Hakan ;
Altunkaya, Hanife .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 29 (02) :139-145
[2]   Randomized trial comparing 3 methods of postoperative analgesia in gynecology patients: patient-controlled intravenous, scheduled intravenous, and scheduled subcutaneous [J].
Bell, Jeffrey G. ;
Shaffer, Lynn E. T. ;
Schrickel-Feller, Trista .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (05) :472.e1-472.e7
[3]   What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? [J].
Cepeda, MS ;
Africano, JM ;
Polo, R ;
Alcala, R ;
Carr, DB .
PAIN, 2003, 105 (1-2) :151-157
[4]  
Ceriati Franco, 2003, Chir Ital, V55, P481
[5]   Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures: A validation study [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Berlin, JA ;
Strom, BL .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 25 (05) :406-411
[6]   A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled epidural analgesia to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after major open gynecologic cancer surgery [J].
Ferguson, Sarah E. ;
Malhotra, Tim ;
Seshan, Venkatraman E. ;
Levine, Douglas A. ;
Sonoda, Yukio ;
Chi, Dennis S. ;
Barakat, Richard R. ;
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (01) :111-116
[7]  
Hudcova J, 2009, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V1
[8]  
Hutchinson R, 2006, HOSP PHARM, V41, P659, DOI 10.1310/hpj4107-659
[9]  
Knudsen W P, 1993, Hosp Pharm, V28, P117
[10]   The use of visual analog scale in urogynecologic research: A psychometric evaluation [J].
Lukacz, ES ;
Lawrence, JM ;
Burchette, RJ ;
Luber, KM ;
Nager, CW ;
Buckwalter, JG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (01) :165-170