Private Governance and the Potential of Private Law

被引:0
作者
Hansen, Ole [1 ]
Petersen, Clement Salung [1 ]
Ulfbeck, Vibe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Law, Law, Ctr Private Governance CEPRI, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF PRIVATE LAW | 2020年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
CORPORATE GROUPS; LIABILITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Private governance can be defined as the phenomenon of private actors pursuing public goals and interests in the exercising of traditional state functions in the forms of rulemaking, implementation and dispute resolution. Private governance in these three 'columns' can have different sources and can be either 'state driven' or 'market driven'. Whereas implications of private governance have to some extent been explored in public law, this article analyses the legal implications in private law and suggests a specific systematic approach. As examples, we focus on the supply chain as a market driven private governance system and the private provision of universal services as a state driven private governance system. The analysis shows how such private governance systems pose an immense challenge to the existing doctrines of private law and create considerable legal uncertainty. The analysis also leads to two more precise findings: (1) a private law analysis can benefit from focusing on the interplay between private governance in the three columns, and (2) the implications in private law seem to be of a different nature in the market driven as compared to the state driven private governance systems analysed.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 373
页数:41
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]  
Abbott KennethW., 2009, VAND J TRANSNATL L, V42, P501
[2]  
AMAN JR A.C., 2009, GOVT CONTRACT
[3]  
AMSTUTZ Marc, 2007, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, V14, P235
[4]  
ANDRECKA M., 2017, SPECIAL ISSUE EPPPL, V3
[5]  
ANDRECKA M., 2017, EUROPEAN PROCUREMENT, V12
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FLA STATE UNIV LAW R
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PROVINCE ADM LAW
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, YB EUROPEAN LAW
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, A/HRC/17/31
[10]  
ARNET R., 2007, FREIHEIT ZWANG BEIM, P51