Developing versus developed companies in Business Excellence initiatives

被引:11
作者
Haffer, Rafal [1 ]
Kristensen, Kai [2 ]
机构
[1] Nicholas Copernicus Univ, Fac Econ Sci & Management, Torun, Poland
[2] Aarhus Sch Business, Dept Informat Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Poland; Denmark; EFQM Excellence Model; Danish Business Excellence Model; companies' efforts in developing business excellence;
D O I
10.1080/14783360802159428
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The paper reports the advance of Polish companies in Business Excellence initiatives. It indicates how these activities influence their performance. EFQM Excellence Model indicators are used as the evaluation criteria for the study. The performance variable is introduced to ensure the calculation of correlations between EFQM model indicators and performance results. The data are next estimated as a structural equation model by partial least squares using SmartPLS software (Ringle et al., 2005). That estimation is conducted on the model of the Danish Business Excellence Index methodology (Kristensen et al., 2001a). The correlations and estimation results are used to discuss the condition of Polish companies and to point out the efforts that should be made for further development. Information about actual financial results for the companies is introduced and the paper discusses the possibility of using results from the Business Excellence Model as a proxy for actual financial results in Poland. Data and results from a similar study done in Denmark are also described; thus, a comparison between developing Polish companies and developed Danish ones is included. Poland and Denmark are used as cases of, respectively, developing and developed European countries.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 775
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, TQM MAGAZINE
  • [2] [Anonymous], ORG SELF ASSESSMENT
  • [3] [Anonymous], EFQM EXC MOD
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, ASSESSING BUSINESS E
  • [5] Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  • [6] A causal model for employee satisfaction
    Eskildsen, JK
    Dahlgaard, JJ
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 2000, 11 (08): : 1081 - 1094
  • [7] FEIGENBAUM AV, 2003, POWER MANAGEMENT CAP
  • [8] HAFFER R, 2005, P 10 WORLD C TOT QUA
  • [9] Haffer R, 2002, SYSTEMY ZARZADZANIA
  • [10] HAKES C, 1997, CORPORATE SELF ASSES