Bias correction in the hierarchical likelihood approach to the analysis of multivariate survival data

被引:5
作者
Jeon, Jihyoun [1 ]
Hsu, Li [1 ]
Gorfine, Malka [2 ]
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Program Biostat & Biomath, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, IL-32000 Technion, Haifa, Israel
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Frailty model; Hierarchical likelihood; Multivariate survival; NPMLE; Penalized likelihood; Semiparametric; REGRESSION-MODELS; LINEAR-MODELS; FRAILTY MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/biostatistics/kxr040
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Frailty models are useful for measuring unobserved heterogeneity in risk of failures across clusters, providing cluster-specific risk prediction. In a frailty model, the latent frailties shared by members within a cluster are assumed to act multiplicatively on the hazard function. In order to obtain parameter and frailty variate estimates, we consider the hierarchical likelihood (H-likelihood) approach (Ha, Lee and Song, 2001. Hierarchical-likelihood approach for frailty models. Biometrika 88, 233-243) in which the latent frailties are treated as "parameters" and estimated jointly with other parameters of interest. We find that the H-likelihood estimators perform well when the censoring rate is low, however, they are substantially biased when the censoring rate is moderate to high. In this paper, we propose a simple and easy-to-implement bias correction method for the H-likelihood estimators under a shared frailty model. We also extend the method to a multivariate frailty model, which incorporates complex dependence structure within clusters. We conduct an extensive simulation study and show that the proposed approach performs very well for censoring rates as high as 80%. We also illustrate the method with a breast cancer data set. Since the H-likelihood is the same as the penalized likelihood function, the proposed bias correction method is also applicable to the penalized likelihood estimators.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 397
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Statistical models based on counting processes
[2]   Small sample bias in the gamma frailty model for univariate survival [J].
Barker, P ;
Henderson, R .
LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2005, 11 (02) :265-284
[3]   Standard errors of prediction in generalized linear mixed models [J].
Booth, JG ;
Hobert, JP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 93 (441) :262-272
[4]   COVARIANCE ANALYSIS OF CENSORED SURVIVAL DATA [J].
BRESLOW, N .
BIOMETRICS, 1974, 30 (01) :89-99
[5]   APPROXIMATE INFERENCE IN GENERALIZED LINEAR MIXED MODELS [J].
BRESLOW, NE ;
CLAYTON, DG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 88 (421) :9-25
[6]  
Carroll J., 2006, MEASUREMENT ERROR NO, V2nd edn, DOI [10.1201/9781420010138, DOI 10.1201/9781420010138]
[7]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[8]   Frailty modelling for survival data from multi-centre clinical trials [J].
Do Ha, Il ;
Sylvester, Richard ;
Legrand, Catherine ;
MacKenzie, Gilbert .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (17) :2144-2159
[9]   Prospective survival analysis with a general semiparametric shared frailty model: A pseudo full likelihood approach [J].
Gorfine, Malka ;
Zucker, David M. ;
Hsu, Li .
BIOMETRIKA, 2006, 93 (03) :735-741
[10]   Hierarchical likelihood approach for frailty models [J].
Ha, ID ;
Lee, Y ;
Song, JK .
BIOMETRIKA, 2001, 88 (01) :233-243