Bias in Radiology: The How and Why of Misses and Misinterpretations

被引:164
作者
Busby, Lindsay P. [1 ]
Courtier, Jesse L.
Glastonbury, Christine M.
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, 505 Parnassus Ave,M-391, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; ACCURACY; STRATEGIES; COGNITION; MODEL; INTERRUPTIONS; RADIOGRAPHS; WORKFLOW; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1148/rg.2018170107
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Medical errors are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the medical field and are substantial contributors to medical costs. Radiologists play an integral role in the diagnosis and care of patients and, given that those in this field interpret millions of examinations annually, may therefore contribute to diagnostic errors. Errors can be categorized as a "miss" when a primary or critical finding is not observed or as a "misinterpretation" when errors in interpretation lead to an incorrect diagnosis. In this article, the authors describe the cognitive causes of such errors in diagnostic medicine, specifically in radiology. Recognizing the cognitive processes that radiologists use while interpreting images should improve one's awareness of the inherent biases that can impact decision making. The authors review the common biases that impact clinical decisions, as well as strategies to counteract or minimize the potential for misdiagnosis. System-level processes that can be implemented to minimize cognitive errors are reviewed, as well as ways to implement personal changes to minimize cognitive errors in daily practice. (c) RSNA, 2017.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 247
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists
    Abujudeh, Hani H.
    Boland, Giles W.
    Kaewlai, Rathachai
    Rabiner, Pavel
    Halpern, Elkarn F.
    Gazelle, G. Scott
    Thrall, James H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (08) : 1952 - 1957
  • [2] Do Telephone Call Interruptions Have an ImPact on Radiology Resident Diagnostic Accuracy?
    Balint, Brad J.
    Steenburg, Scott D.
    Lin, Hongbu
    Shen, Changyu
    Steele, Jennifer L.
    Gunderman, Richard B.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (12) : 1623 - 1628
  • [3] SATISFACTION OF SEARCH IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY
    BERBAUM, KS
    FRANKEN, EA
    DORFMAN, DD
    ROOHOLAMINI, SA
    KATHOL, MH
    BARLOON, TJ
    BEHLKE, FM
    SATO, Y
    LU, CH
    ELKHOURY, GY
    FLICKINGER, FW
    MONTGOMERY, WJ
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [4] Perceptual errors
    Berlin, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (03) : 587 - 590
  • [5] Comparing new radiographs with those obtained previously
    Berlin, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [6] Malpractice issues in radiology - Defending the "missed" radiographic diagnosis
    Berlin, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) : 317 - 322
  • [7] Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: Has it improved over the past five decades?
    Berlin, Leonard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05) : 1173 - 1178
  • [8] The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them
    Croskerry, P
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2003, 78 (08) : 775 - 780
  • [9] Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decisionmaking
    Croskerry, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 41 (01) : 110 - 120
  • [10] Croskerry P, 2002, ACAD EMERG MED, V9, P1184, DOI 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01574.x