980-Nm Diode Laser Vaporization versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Controlled Study

被引:6
作者
Cetinkaya, Mehmet [1 ]
Onem, Kadir [2 ]
Rifaioglu, Mehmet Murat [3 ]
Yalcin, Veli [4 ]
机构
[1] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Mugla, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Ondokuz Mayis Med Fac, Dept Urol, Samsun, Turkey
[3] Mustafa Kemal Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Antakya, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpasa Med Fac, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
ablation techniques; lasers; semiconductor; therapeutic use; prostatic neoplasms; surgery; transurethral resection of prostate; urinary bladder neck obstruction; urinary catheterization; PHOTOSELECTIVE VAPORIZATION; KTP LASER; ABLATION; TRIAL; HYPERTROPHY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared the effectiveness and complications of 980-nm diode laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods: In total, 72 consecutive patients with BPH entered the study. All patients underwent general and urological evaluations. The primary outcome was improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). The secondary outcomes were IPSS quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual volume, and complications. Patients were allocated randomly to the TURP and laser groups. The Ceralas HPD120, a diode laser system emitting at a wavelength of 980 nm, was used for photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP). TURP was performed with a monopolar 26 French resectoscope. Preoperative and operative parameters and surgical outcomes were compared. Results: In total, 36 patients in each group underwent PVP and TURP. The mean age standard deviation was 63.1 +/- 9.1 years and 64.7 +/- 10.2 years in the PVP and TURP groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in age, prostate size, prostate-specific antigen concentration, Qmax, preoperative IPSS, or preoperative Qmax between the two groups. The operation duration was also similar between the groups (P =.36). The catheterization time was 1.45 +/- 0.75 and 2.63 +/- 0.49 days in the PVP and TURP groups, respectively (P <.01). The PVP group had a shorter hospital stay than the TURP group. The 3-month postoperative Qmax increased to 9.90 +/- 3.61 and 6.59 +/- 6.06 mL/s from baseline in the TURP and PVP groups, respectively; there was no difference in the increases between the groups (P =.08). The IPSS and IPSS-QoL were significantly improved with the operation (P <.01), and this improvement was similar in both groups P=.3 and P=.8, respectively. The complication rate was also similar between the two groups. Conclusions: PVP with a diode laser is as safe and effective as TURP in the treatment of BPH, and the techniques have similar complication rates and functional results. PVP has the advantage of shorter hospitalization and catheter indwelling times and no need for discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:2355 / 2361
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of 980 nm diode laser vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A prospective study
    Mithani, M. Hammad
    El Khalid, Salman
    Khan, Shariq Anis
    Sharif, Imran
    Awan, Adnan Siddiq
    Mithani, Shoaib
    Majeed, Irfan
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2018, 59 (06) : 392 - 398
  • [2] Early Experiences of Contact Laser Vaporization of the Prostate using the 980nm High Power Diode Laser for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Miyazaki, Hideyo
    Hirano, Yoshikazu
    Kato, Shinobu
    Ioritani, Naomasa
    Ichikawa, Takaharu
    Takamoto, Hitoshi
    Homma, Yukio
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2018, 10 (03) : 242 - 246
  • [3] Diode Laser (980 nm) Vaporization in Comparison With Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Clinical Trial With 2-year Follow-up
    Razzaghi, Mohammad Reza
    Mazloomfard, Mohammad Mohsen
    Mokhtarpour, Hooman
    Moeini, Aida
    UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (03) : 526 - 532
  • [4] Initial Experiences with a 980 nm Diode Laser for Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Yang, Ki Su
    Seong, Youl Keun
    Kim, In Gon
    Han, Bo Hyun
    Kong, Geun Soo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 52 (11) : 752 - 756
  • [5] 980-nm diode laser:: A novel laser technology for vaporization of the prostate
    Wendt-Nordahl, Gunnar
    Huckele, Stephanie
    Honeck, Patrick
    Alken, Peter
    Knoll, Thomas
    Michel, Maurice Stephan
    Haecker, Axel
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (06) : 1723 - 1728
  • [6] Enucleation of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Using a 980 nm Diode Laser
    Zhang, Yaqun
    Fu, Chunlong
    Wang, Jinfu
    Wu, Pengjie
    Chen, Xin
    Hou, Huimin
    Song, Xinda
    Cheng, Wanli
    Wang, Jianye
    Liu, Ming
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2020, (159):
  • [7] Greenlight laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: evidence from randomized controlled studies
    Elhilali, Mostafa M.
    Elkoushy, Mohamed A.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2016, 5 (03) : 388 - 392
  • [8] Photoselective Vaporization Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Xiaolong
    Geng, Jiang
    Zheng, Junhua
    Peng, Bo
    Che, Jianping
    Liang, Chang
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (09) : 1109 - 1117
  • [9] High Power Diode Laser Vaporization of the Prostate: Preliminary Results for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Erol, Ali
    Cam, Kamil
    Tekin, Ali
    Memik, Omur
    Coban, Soner
    Ozer, Yavuz
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (03) : 1078 - 1082
  • [10] GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A prospective randomized trial
    Xue, Boxin
    Zang, Yachen
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Yang, Dongrong
    Gao, Jie
    Sun, Chuanyang
    Cui, Yong
    Zhu, Jin
    Liu, Xiaolong
    Shan, Yuxi
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 21 (01) : 125 - 132