The Significance of Augmented High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Detection on Pap Test Examination: Partial Results from the RODEO Study Team

被引:4
作者
Scapulatempo, Cristovam [1 ]
Fregnani, Jose Humberto T. G. [1 ,2 ]
Campacci, Natalia [1 ]
Possati-Resende, Julio Cesar [1 ]
Longatto-Filho, Adhemar [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Barretos Canc Hosp, Pio Fdn 12, Barretos, Brazil
[2] Barretos Canc Hosp, Pio Fdn 12, Mol Oncol Res Ctr, Barretos, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Lab Med Invest 14, BR-1246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Minho, Sch Hlth Sci, Life & Hlth Sci Res Inst, Braga, Portugal
[5] Life & Hlth Sci Res Inst 3Bs, PT Govt Associate Lab, Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Pap test; Cytological screening; Liquid-based cytology; SurePath (TM); Cytopathology; LIQUID-BASED CYTOLOGY; CONVENTIONAL CERVICAL CYTOLOGY; ACCURACY; SYSTEM; RESOURCE; SMEAR;
D O I
10.1159/000351789
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Objective:This study sought to ascertain the significance of augmented high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) detection by Pap test using both conventional smear and liquid-based cytology (LBC) in a high-risk population. Study Design: We conducted a direct-to-vial study to compare the diagnostic performance of Pap smear versus LBC in a high-risk population of women referred for colposcopy at a gynecologic ambulatory clinic at the Barretos Cancer Hospital in Brazil during 2011. Results: The detection of both low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) and HSILs was significantly greater (p = 0.04 and p = 0.033, respectively) in the LBC arm [84 LSIL cases (5.7%) and 148 HSIL cases (10.1%)] than in the conventional smear arm [66 LSIL cases (4.1%) and 126 HSIL cases (7.9%)]; however, no differences were found for invasive squamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma (p = 0.678). Of 3,071 women who were examined cytologically (1,604 conventional preparations and 1,467 LBC) and colposcopically, biopsies were available for 279 conventional preparations (17.6%) and 325 LBC preparations (22.2%). No significant differences were found between the methods with respect to diagnostic performance. Conclusion: LBC was significantly superior to conventional smears for the detection of LSILs and HSILs, but these results did not influence biopsy confirmation. Both methods showed similar performances with high positive predictive values but very low sensitivities. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 494
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[21]   The Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS Imaging System Clinical Trials Demonstrate Significantly Improved Sensitivity for the Detection of Important Cervical Lesions [J].
Wilbur, David C. ;
Black-Schaffer, W. Stephen ;
Luff, Ronald D. ;
Abraham, Kurian P. ;
Kemper, Cynthia ;
Molina, James T. ;
Tench, William D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 132 (05) :767-775