The Significance of Augmented High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Detection on Pap Test Examination: Partial Results from the RODEO Study Team

被引:4
作者
Scapulatempo, Cristovam [1 ]
Fregnani, Jose Humberto T. G. [1 ,2 ]
Campacci, Natalia [1 ]
Possati-Resende, Julio Cesar [1 ]
Longatto-Filho, Adhemar [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Barretos Canc Hosp, Pio Fdn 12, Barretos, Brazil
[2] Barretos Canc Hosp, Pio Fdn 12, Mol Oncol Res Ctr, Barretos, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Lab Med Invest 14, BR-1246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Minho, Sch Hlth Sci, Life & Hlth Sci Res Inst, Braga, Portugal
[5] Life & Hlth Sci Res Inst 3Bs, PT Govt Associate Lab, Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Pap test; Cytological screening; Liquid-based cytology; SurePath (TM); Cytopathology; LIQUID-BASED CYTOLOGY; CONVENTIONAL CERVICAL CYTOLOGY; ACCURACY; SYSTEM; RESOURCE; SMEAR;
D O I
10.1159/000351789
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Objective:This study sought to ascertain the significance of augmented high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) detection by Pap test using both conventional smear and liquid-based cytology (LBC) in a high-risk population. Study Design: We conducted a direct-to-vial study to compare the diagnostic performance of Pap smear versus LBC in a high-risk population of women referred for colposcopy at a gynecologic ambulatory clinic at the Barretos Cancer Hospital in Brazil during 2011. Results: The detection of both low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) and HSILs was significantly greater (p = 0.04 and p = 0.033, respectively) in the LBC arm [84 LSIL cases (5.7%) and 148 HSIL cases (10.1%)] than in the conventional smear arm [66 LSIL cases (4.1%) and 126 HSIL cases (7.9%)]; however, no differences were found for invasive squamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma (p = 0.678). Of 3,071 women who were examined cytologically (1,604 conventional preparations and 1,467 LBC) and colposcopically, biopsies were available for 279 conventional preparations (17.6%) and 325 LBC preparations (22.2%). No significant differences were found between the methods with respect to diagnostic performance. Conclusion: LBC was significantly superior to conventional smears for the detection of LSILs and HSILs, but these results did not influence biopsy confirmation. Both methods showed similar performances with high positive predictive values but very low sensitivities. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 494
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Alves VAF, 2004, ACTA CYTOL, V48, P187, DOI 10.1159/000326314
  • [2] Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arbyn, Marc
    Bergeron, Christine
    Klinkhamer, Paul
    Martin-Hirsch, Pierre
    Siebers, Albertus G.
    Bulten, Johan
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (01) : 167 - 177
  • [3] Arbyn M, 2011, METHODS MOL BIOL, V675, P279, DOI 10.1007/978-1-59745-423-0_15
  • [4] Cox J Thomas, 2004, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, V2, P597
  • [5] Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review
    Davey, E
    Barratt, A
    Irwig, L
    Chan, SF
    Macaskill, P
    Mannes, P
    Saville, AM
    [J]. LANCET, 2006, 367 (9505) : 122 - 132
  • [6] Cervical cancer screening following prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccination
    Franco, Eduardo L.
    Cuzick, Jack
    [J]. VACCINE, 2008, 26 : A16 - A23
  • [7] Correction for reported cervical cancer mortality data in Brazil, 1996-2005
    Gamarra, Carmen Justina
    Valente, Joaquim Goncalves
    Azevedo e Silva, Gulnar
    [J]. REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2010, 44 (04): : 629 - 638
  • [8] A comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of cervical pre-cancer detection methods in a high-risk area in East Congo
    Hovland, S.
    Arbyn, M.
    Lie, A. K.
    Ryd, W.
    Borge, B.
    Berle, E. J.
    Skomedal, H.
    Kadima, T. M.
    Kyembwa, L.
    Billay, E. M.
    Mukwege, D.
    Chirimwami, R. B.
    Mvula, T. M.
    Snijders, P. J.
    Meijer, C. J. L. M.
    Karlsen, F.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 102 (06) : 957 - 965
  • [9] HOMOGENEOUS SAMPLING ACCOUNTS FOR THE INCREASED DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY USING THE THINPREP(TM) PROCESSOR
    HUTCHINSON, ML
    ISENSTEIN, LM
    GOODMAN, A
    HURLEY, AA
    DOUGLASS, KL
    MUI, KK
    PATTEN, FW
    ZAHNISER, DJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1994, 101 (02) : 215 - 219
  • [10] A comparison of HPV DNA testing and liquid based cytology over three rounds of primary cervical screening: Extended follow up in the ARTISTIC trial
    Kitchener, Henry C.
    Gilham, Clare
    Sargent, Alexandra
    Bailey, Andrew
    Albrow, Rebecca
    Roberts, Christopher
    Desai, Mina
    Mather, Jean
    Turner, Andrew
    Moss, Sue
    Peto, Julian
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 (06) : 864 - 871