Monitoring Excess Exposure to Air Pollution for Professional Drivers in London Using Low-Cost Sensors

被引:15
作者
Frederickson, Louise Boge [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Shanon [3 ]
Russell, Hugo Savill [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Kwiatkowski, Szymon [2 ]
Bonomaully, James [2 ]
Schmidt, Johan Albrecht [2 ]
Hertel, Ole [4 ,5 ]
Mudway, Ian [3 ]
Barratt, Benjamin [3 ]
Johnson, Matthew Stanley [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Chem, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] AirLabs Denmark, Nannasgade 28, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Imperial Coll London, MRC Ctr Environm & Hlth, Environm Res Grp, London SW7 2BU, England
[4] Aarhus Univ, Dept Environm Sci, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ, Danish Big Data Ctr Environm & Hlth BERTHA, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
in-cabin air pollution; mobile sensing; low-cost sensors; personal exposure; workplace exposure; CARBON-DIOXIDE; ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS; COMMUTER EXPOSURE; PERSONAL EXPOSURE; EUROPEAN CITIES; PARTICLE NUMBER; QUALITY; INDOOR; RISK; CYCLISTS;
D O I
10.3390/atmos11070749
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this pilot study, low-cost air pollution sensor nodes were fitted in waste removal trucks, hospital vans and taxis to record drivers' exposure to air pollution in Central London. Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), CO2, NO2, temperature and humidity were recorded in real-time with nodes containing low-cost sensors, an electrochemical gas sensor for NO2, an optical particle counter for PM2.5 and PM10 and a non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) sensor for CO2, temperature and relative humidity. An intervention using a pollution filter to trap PM and NO(2)was also evaluated. The measurements were compared with urban background and roadside monitoring stations at Honor Oak Park and Marylebone Road, respectively. The vehicle records show PM and NO(2)concentrations similar to Marylebone Road and a higher NO2-to-PM ratio than at Honor Oak Park. Drivers are exposed to elevated pollution levels relative to Honor Oak Park: 1.72 mu g m(-3), 1.92 mu g m(-3) and 58.38 ppb for PM2.5, PM10, and NO2, respectively. The CO2 levels ranged from 410 to over 4000 ppm. There is a significant difference in average concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 between the vehicle types and a non-significant difference in the average concentrations measured with and without the pollution filter within the sectors. In conclusion, drivers face elevated air pollution exposure as part of their jobs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Indoor to outdoor air quality associations with self-pollution implications inside passenger car cabins [J].
Abi-Esber, L. ;
El-Fadel, M. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 81 :450-463
[2]   Characterization of indoor particle sources: A study conducted in the metropolitan Boston area [J].
Abt, E ;
Suh, HH ;
Allen, G ;
Koutrakis, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 108 (01) :35-44
[3]  
American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 2001, 1 ANSI ASHRAE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Technical report
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Technical report
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, WHO AIR QUALITY GUID
[7]   Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring [J].
Badura, Marek ;
Batog, Piotr ;
Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, Anetta ;
Modzel, Piotr .
JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2018, 2018
[8]  
Budde M., 2018, PROSCIENCE, P6, DOI [10.14644/DUST.2018.002, DOI 10.14644/DUST.2018.002, 10.14644/dust.2018.002]
[9]  
BULOT FMJ, 2020, SENSORS BASEL, V0020
[10]   Levels of ambient air pollution according to mode of transport: a systematic review [J].
Cepeda, Magda ;
Schoufour, Josje ;
Freak-Poli, Rosanne ;
Koolhaas, Chantal M. ;
Dhana, Klodian ;
Bramer, Wichor M. ;
Franco, Oscar H. .
LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 2 (01) :E23-E34