Reach Out and Touch Me: Effects of Four Distinct Haptic Technologies on Affective Touch in Virtual Reality

被引:39
作者
Ahmed, Imtiaj [1 ]
Harjunen, Ville [1 ]
Jacucci, Giulio [1 ,2 ]
Hoggan, Eve [6 ]
Ravaja, Niklas [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Spape, Michiel M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Comp Sci, HIIT, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Comp Sci, HIIT, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Liverpool Hope Univ, Dept Psychol, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Coll Adv Studies, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Aalto Univ, Sch Business, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Aalto Univ, Aalto Sci Inst, Helsinki, Finland
来源
ICMI'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION | 2016年
关键词
Virtual reality; Haptic technologies; Affective communication; Facial expressions; COMMUNICATION; EMOTION;
D O I
10.1145/2993148.2993171
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Virtual reality presents an extraordinary platform for multimodal communication. Haptic technologies have been shown to provide an important contribution to this by facilitating co-presence and allowing affective communication. However, the findings of the affective influences rely on studies that have used myriad different types of haptic technology, making it likely that some forms of tactile feedback are more efficient in communicating emotions than others. To find out whether this is true and which haptic technologies are most effective, we measured user experience during a communication scenario featuring an affective agent and interpersonal touch in virtual reality. Interpersonal touch was simulated using two types of vibrotactile actuators and two types of force feedback mechanisms. Self-reports of subjective experience of the agent's touch and emotions were obtained. The results revealed that, regardless of the agent's expression, force feedback actuators were rated as more natural and resulted in greater emotional interdependence and a stronger sense of copresence than vibrotactile touch.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 348
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Ahmed I., 2016, SYMBIOTIC INTERACTIO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, P EUROHAPTICS
[3]  
[Anonymous], MEASURING FACIAL MOV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1971, The face of emotion
[5]   Nonverbal Channel Use in Communication of Emotion: How May Depend on Why [J].
App, Betsy ;
McIntosh, Daniel N. ;
Reed, Catherine L. ;
Hertenstein, Matthew J. .
EMOTION, 2011, 11 (03) :603-617
[6]  
Bailenson JN, 2007, HUM-COMPUT INTERACT, V22, P325
[7]  
Cabibihan John-John, 2012, Social Robotics. 4th International Conference (ICSR 2012). Proceedings, P348, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_35
[8]  
Courgeon M., 2008, P 1 WORKSH AFFECTIVE
[9]  
Courgeon M, 2009, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V5773, P201, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04380-2_24
[10]   Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection [J].
Dalal, N ;
Triggs, B .
2005 IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, :886-893