Polar body analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization accurately predicts aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age

被引:40
作者
Christopikou, Dimitra [1 ]
Tsorva, Erika [1 ]
Economou, Konstantinos [1 ]
Shelley, Piran [2 ]
Davies, Stephen [1 ]
Mastrominas, Minas [1 ]
Handyside, Alan H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Human Reprod, Dept Embryogenesis, Athens 15123, Greece
[2] Bluegnome Ltd, Cambridge CB21 5XE, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Inst Integrat & Comparat Biol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
chromosome aneuploidy; meiosis; pre-implantation genetic screening; polar body; array CGH; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; CGH; MORPHOLOGY; MOSAICISM; DIAGNOSIS; ERRORS; PGD;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/det053
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
How accurate is array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) analysis of the first polar body (PB1) and second polar body (PB2) in predicting aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in the cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age? Almost all of the aneuploidies detected in cleavage stage embryos were associated with copy number changes in the polar bodies (93) and all but one (98.5) were predicted to be aneuploid. A minority of copy number changes (17), mainly in PB1, did not result in the predicted changes in the embryo, but many of these were small copy number changes, which are likely to be artefacts. Chromosome aneuploidy is a major cause of pregnancy failure and loss, abnormal pregnancy and live births. Most aneuploidy is of maternal meiotic origin and increases exponentially in the decade preceding the menopause. A pilot study demonstrated a high rate of concordance between the chromosomal status predicted by polar body analysis and the corresponding zygotes in women of advanced maternal age. Polar body biopsy and array CGH analysis of mature oocytes, which fertilized normally, to identify segregation errors in meiosis, followed by the analysis of the corresponding cleavage stage embryos (n 34), in a consecutive series of stimulated and natural IVF cycles in women of advanced maternal age. Twenty couples requesting aneuploidy screening (mean SD of maternal age 39 3 years) had 16 controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and 7 natural IVF cycles. PB1 and PB2 were biopsied from mature oocytes, prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and following confirmation of normal fertilization, respectively. Array CGH was used to detect chromosome copy number changes and to predict aneuploidy in the corresponding embryos. Embryos with normal copy number in both polar bodies were transferred but, 34 cleavage stage embryos, most of which were predicted to have one or more aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin, were analysed in whole after removal of the zona by array CGH, on Day 3 post-ICSI. Thirty cleavage stage embryos, predicted to have one or more aneuploidies, were all confirmed to be aneuploid (100 concordant). Seventy four aneuploidies were detected in these embryos. Sixty-nine (93) aneuploidies were associated with copy number changes in the polar bodies and 68 (98.5) of these had been predicted to be aneuploid. Also, 19 of 20 (95) balanced combinations of chromatid gain/loss in PB1/PB2 accurately predicted normal copy number in the corresponding embryos. However, 17 (12) copy number changes in the polar bodies did not result in the expected outcome, including 12 false positive predictions of aneuploidy. Most of these involved copy number changes that were smaller than would be expected for whole chromosome or chromatid imbalance and occurred significantly more often in PB1 than PB2 (P 0.0005). Three other embryos with only small copy number changes and one embryo with a partial chromosome loss in PB2, were all confirmed to be euploid. Accurate false positive and negative rates will require follow-up of both euploid and aneuploid embryos, ideally using molecular genetic markers to detect aneuploidy independently and to identify their origin. Polar body biopsy and array CGH analysis is efficient and accurately predicts most aneuploidies in cleavage stage embryos. However, the size of the ratio shifts, particularly in PB1, should always be compared with the X chromosome shift before it can be concluded that there is a real copy number change. Study funded by Embryogenesis, Athens. P.S. and A.H.H. are employed full time and part time, respectively, by BlueGnome Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
引用
收藏
页码:1426 / 1434
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development
    Capalbo, Antonio
    Bono, Sara
    Spizzichino, Letizia
    Biricik, Anil
    Baldi, Marina
    Colamaria, Silvia
    Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
    Rienzi, Laura
    Fiorentino, Francesco
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (02) : 509 - 518
  • [2] Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers
    De Vos, A.
    Staessen, C.
    De Rycke, M.
    Verpoest, W.
    Haentjens, P.
    Devroey, P.
    Liebaers, I.
    Van de Velde, H.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (12) : 2988 - 2996
  • [3] Multicolour FISH detects frequent chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal preimplantation embryos from fertile patients
    Delhanty, JDA
    Harper, JC
    Ao, A
    Handyside, AH
    Winston, RML
    [J]. HUMAN GENETICS, 1997, 99 (06) : 755 - 760
  • [4] Fishel S, 2011, J FERTIL IN VITRO, V1, P101
  • [5] Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF?
    Fishel, Simon
    Gordon, Anthony
    Lynch, Colleen
    Dowell, Ken
    Ndukwe, George
    Kelada, Ehab
    Thornton, Simon
    Jenner, Lucy
    Cater, Ellen
    Brown, Anthony
    Garcia-Bernardo, Jose
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (03) : 1006.e7 - 1006.e10
  • [6] Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results
    Geraedts, Joep
    Montag, Markus
    Magli, M. Cristina
    Repping, Sjoerd
    Handyside, Alan
    Staessen, Catherine
    Harper, Joyce
    Schmutzler, Andreas
    Collins, John
    Goossens, Veerle
    van der Ven, Hans
    Vesela, Katerina
    Gianaroli, Luca
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (11) : 3173 - 3180
  • [7] Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos
    Gutierrez-Mateo, Cristina
    Colls, Pere
    Sanchez-Garcia, Jorge
    Escudero, Tomas
    Prates, Renata
    Ketterson, Kelly
    Wells, Dagan
    Munne, Santiago
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (03) : 953 - 958
  • [8] Molecular origin of female meiotic aneuploidies
    Handyside, Alan H.
    [J]. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-MOLECULAR BASIS OF DISEASE, 2012, 1822 (12): : 1913 - 1920
  • [9] Multiple meiotic errors caused by predivision of chromatids in women of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilisation
    Handyside, Alan H.
    Montag, Markus
    Magli, M. Cristina
    Repping, Sjoerd
    Harper, Joyce
    Schmutzler, Andreas
    Vesela, Katerina
    Gianaroli, Luca
    Geraedts, Joep
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2012, 20 (07) : 742 - 747
  • [10] Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes
    Handyside, Alan H.
    Harton, Gary L.
    Mariani, Brian
    Thornhil, Alan R.
    Affara, Nabeel
    Shaw, Marie-Anne
    Griffin, Darren K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2010, 47 (10) : 651 - 658