Failing to Forget: Prospective Memory Commission Errors Can Result From Spontaneous Retrieval and Impaired Executive Control

被引:45
作者
Scullin, Michael K. [1 ]
Bugg, Julie M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Neurol, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[3] Depauw Univ, Dept Psychol, Greencastle, IN USA
关键词
prospective memory; commission errors; spontaneous retrieval; fatigue; executive control; TASK INTERFERENCE; INTENTIONS; ACTIVATION; DEACTIVATION; PERFORMANCE; ADULTS; COST; CUE;
D O I
10.1037/a0029198
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Prospective memory (PM) research typically examines the ability to remember to execute delayed intentions but often ignores the ability to forget finished intentions. We had participants perform (or not perform; control group) a PM task and then instructed them that the PM task was finished. We later (re)presented the PM cue. Approximately 25% of participants made a commission error, the erroneous repetition of a PM response following intention completion. Comparisons between the PM groups and control group suggested that commission errors occurred in the absence of preparatory monitoring. Response time analyses additionally suggested that some participants experienced fatigue across the ongoing task block, and those who did were more susceptible to making a commission error. These results supported the hypothesis that commission errors can arise from the spontaneous retrieval of finished intentions and possibly the failure to exert executive control to oppose the PM response.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 971
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, U S FLORIDA WORD ASS
[2]   A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DA .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2002, 26 (07) :809-817
[3]  
Bugg J. M., 2012, EFFECTS ENCODI UNPUB
[4]   The intention interference effect and aging: Similar magnitude of effects for young and old adults [J].
Cohen, AL ;
Dixon, RA ;
Lindsay, DS .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 19 (09) :1177-1197
[5]   The Intention Interference Effect The Difficulty of Ignoring What You Intend to Do [J].
Cohen, Anna-Lisa ;
Kantner, Justin ;
Dixon, Roger A. ;
Lindsay, D. Stephen .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 58 (06) :425-433
[6]   Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval [J].
Einstein, GO ;
McDaniel, MA ;
Thomas, R ;
Mayfield, S ;
Shank, H ;
Morrisette, N ;
Breneiser, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2005, 134 (03) :327-342
[7]   Habitual prospective memory and aging: Remembering intentions and forgetting actions [J].
Einstein, GO ;
McDaniel, MA ;
Smith, RE ;
Shaw, P .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (04) :284-288
[8]   REPRESENTATION OF INTENTIONS - PERSISTING ACTIVATION IN MEMORY [J].
GOSCHKE, T ;
KUHL, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (05) :1211-1226
[9]   Target preexposure eliminates the effect of distraction on event-based prospective memory [J].
Guynn, Melissa J. ;
Mcdaniel, Mark A. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (03) :484-488
[10]   Prospective memory: Are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue? [J].
Harrison, Tyler L. ;
Einstein, Gilles O. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (07) :860-867