Effects of cubicle characteristics on animal welfare indicators in dairy cattle

被引:19
作者
Gieseke, D. [1 ,3 ]
Lambertz, C. [2 ]
Gauly, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Dept Anim Sci, Albrecht Thaer Weg 3, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Free Univ Bolzano, Fac Sci & Technol, Univ Pl 5, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
[3] Univ Kassel, Fac Organ Agr Sci, Nordbahnhofstr 1a, D-37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
关键词
dairy cows; housing system; cubicle design; Welfare Quality (R) protocol; well-being; RISK-FACTORS; LEG INJURIES; COW COMFORT; LYING TIME; LAMENESS; SYSTEMS; CLEANLINESS; QUALITY(R); BEHAVIOR; HOCK;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731120000609
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Cubicle characteristics such as cubicle dimensions or management factors such as cow-to-cubicle ratio could affect health and behaviour of dairy cows. The objective of this study was to estimate effects of cubicle characteristics on animal welfare indicators in dairy cattle. A total of 64 loose housing farms in Germany were assessed once during the winter housing period by one experienced assessor. Nearly 15% of the dairy cows had access to pasture during summer months for <6 h/day, whereas 85% were zero-grazing farms. Selected animal welfare indicators (duration of the lying down process, collisions of cows with cubicles, cows lying outside cubicles, cow cleanliness, integument alterations, lameness and subclinical mastitis incidence) of the Welfare Quality (R) protocol and cubicle characteristics such as cow-to-cubicle ratio and cubicle dimensions were recorded. Data were statistically analysed using a multiple linear regression approach. Pasture access and cubicle type were considered as potential influencing factors. Wider cubicles positively affected the proportion of dairy cows with dirty flanks (-18.5% per 10 cm increase) but increased the number of cows with severe integument alterations (+8.9% per 10 cm increase). Larger lying areas reduced the percentage of cows with dirty udders (-2.9% per 10 cm(2) increase). Longer distances from neck rail to curb were associated with higher prevalence of cows with dirty flanks (+3.1% per 10 cm increase) and subclinical mastitis incidence (+1.2% per 10 cm increase). With increasing neck rail height, the duration of the lying down process (-0.1 s per 10% increase), the percentages of cows with dirty legs (-8.4% per 10 cm increase), dirty udders (-7.0% per 10 cm increase) and severe lameness (-3.0% per 10 cm increase) decreased. Compared with rubber mat-equipped cubicles, deep-bedded cubicles showed a reduction in the lying down duration (-0.8 s), percentages of cows with dirty legs (-34.2%), dirty udders (-30.5%) and lesions and swellings (-13.1%). Compared with farms that did not provide any summer grazing, pasture access was associated with an increase of cows with severe lameness (+5.6%). Contrastingly, the number of cows with subclinical mastitis incidence was lower when cows had access to pasture in summer (-5.4%). Findings of the present study indicate several associations between cubicle characteristics and animal welfare in dairy cattle. Bedding type was found as the most influencing factor in terms of health and behaviour. Results of this study are valuable for farmers to identify the optimal cubicle design and improve the animal welfare level.
引用
收藏
页码:1934 / 1942
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Invited review: Associations between variables of routine herd data and dairy cattle welfare indicators [J].
de Vries, M. ;
Bokkers, E. A. M. ;
Dijkstra, T. ;
van Schaik, G. ;
de Boer, I. J. M. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (07) :3213-3228
[42]   The future of surplus dairy calves - an animal welfare perspective [J].
Webb, Laura E. ;
Verwer, Cynthia ;
Bokkers, Eddie A. M. .
FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 4
[43]   Canadian dairy farmer views about animal welfare [J].
Schuppli, Catherine A. ;
Spooner, Jeffrey M. ;
von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G. .
ANIMAL WELFARE, 2023, 32
[44]   A New, Practical Animal Welfare Assessment for Dairy Farmers [J].
van Eerdenburg, Frank J. C. M. ;
Di Giacinto, Alice M. ;
Hulsen, Jan ;
Snel, Bert ;
Stegeman, J. Arjan .
ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (03) :1-21
[45]   Animal health and welfare state and technical efficiency of dairy farms: possible synergies [J].
Tremetsberger, L. ;
Winckler, C. ;
Kantelhardt, J. .
ANIMAL WELFARE, 2019, 28 (03) :345-352
[46]   Evaluating the need for an animal welfare assurance programme in South Tyrolean dairy farming [J].
Katzenberger, Katja ;
Rauch, Elke ;
Erhard, Michael ;
Reese, Sven ;
Gauly, Matthias .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 19 (01) :1147-1157
[47]   Register-based predictors of violations of animal welfare legislation in dairy herds [J].
Otten, N. D. ;
Nielsen, L. R. ;
Thomsen, P. T. ;
Houe, H. .
ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (12) :1963-1970
[48]   Negative attitudes of Danish dairy farmers to their livestock correlates negatively with animal welfare [J].
Andreasen, S. N. ;
Sandoe, P. ;
Waiblinger, S. ;
Forkman, B. .
ANIMAL WELFARE, 2020, 29 (01) :89-98
[49]   Assessment of on-farm welfare for dairy cattle in southern Spain and its effects on reproductive parameters [J].
Molina, Laura ;
Aguera, Estrella ;
Maroto-Molina, Francisco ;
Carmelo Perez-Marine, Carlos .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2019, 86 (02) :165-170
[50]   Environmental Quality and Compliance with Animal Welfare Legislation at Swedish Cattle and Sheep Farms [J].
Hultgren, Jan ;
Hiron, Matthew ;
Glimskar, Anders ;
Bokkers, Eddie A. M. ;
Keeling, Linda J. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)