Effects of cubicle characteristics on animal welfare indicators in dairy cattle

被引:19
作者
Gieseke, D. [1 ,3 ]
Lambertz, C. [2 ]
Gauly, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Dept Anim Sci, Albrecht Thaer Weg 3, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Free Univ Bolzano, Fac Sci & Technol, Univ Pl 5, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
[3] Univ Kassel, Fac Organ Agr Sci, Nordbahnhofstr 1a, D-37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
关键词
dairy cows; housing system; cubicle design; Welfare Quality (R) protocol; well-being; RISK-FACTORS; LEG INJURIES; COW COMFORT; LYING TIME; LAMENESS; SYSTEMS; CLEANLINESS; QUALITY(R); BEHAVIOR; HOCK;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731120000609
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Cubicle characteristics such as cubicle dimensions or management factors such as cow-to-cubicle ratio could affect health and behaviour of dairy cows. The objective of this study was to estimate effects of cubicle characteristics on animal welfare indicators in dairy cattle. A total of 64 loose housing farms in Germany were assessed once during the winter housing period by one experienced assessor. Nearly 15% of the dairy cows had access to pasture during summer months for <6 h/day, whereas 85% were zero-grazing farms. Selected animal welfare indicators (duration of the lying down process, collisions of cows with cubicles, cows lying outside cubicles, cow cleanliness, integument alterations, lameness and subclinical mastitis incidence) of the Welfare Quality (R) protocol and cubicle characteristics such as cow-to-cubicle ratio and cubicle dimensions were recorded. Data were statistically analysed using a multiple linear regression approach. Pasture access and cubicle type were considered as potential influencing factors. Wider cubicles positively affected the proportion of dairy cows with dirty flanks (-18.5% per 10 cm increase) but increased the number of cows with severe integument alterations (+8.9% per 10 cm increase). Larger lying areas reduced the percentage of cows with dirty udders (-2.9% per 10 cm(2) increase). Longer distances from neck rail to curb were associated with higher prevalence of cows with dirty flanks (+3.1% per 10 cm increase) and subclinical mastitis incidence (+1.2% per 10 cm increase). With increasing neck rail height, the duration of the lying down process (-0.1 s per 10% increase), the percentages of cows with dirty legs (-8.4% per 10 cm increase), dirty udders (-7.0% per 10 cm increase) and severe lameness (-3.0% per 10 cm increase) decreased. Compared with rubber mat-equipped cubicles, deep-bedded cubicles showed a reduction in the lying down duration (-0.8 s), percentages of cows with dirty legs (-34.2%), dirty udders (-30.5%) and lesions and swellings (-13.1%). Compared with farms that did not provide any summer grazing, pasture access was associated with an increase of cows with severe lameness (+5.6%). Contrastingly, the number of cows with subclinical mastitis incidence was lower when cows had access to pasture in summer (-5.4%). Findings of the present study indicate several associations between cubicle characteristics and animal welfare in dairy cattle. Bedding type was found as the most influencing factor in terms of health and behaviour. Results of this study are valuable for farmers to identify the optimal cubicle design and improve the animal welfare level.
引用
收藏
页码:1934 / 1942
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Symposium review: Considerations for the future of dairy cattle housing: An animal welfare perspective
    Beaver, Annabelle
    Proudfoot, Kathryn L.
    von Keyserling, Marina A. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (06) : 5746 - 5758
  • [32] Training method for animal-based measures in dairy cattle welfare assessments
    Croyle, S. L.
    Nash, C. G. R.
    Bauman, C.
    LeBlanc, S. J.
    Haley, D. B.
    Khosa, D. K.
    Kelton, D. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (10) : 9463 - 9471
  • [33] Organic Dairy Cattle: Do European Union Regulations Promote Animal Welfare?
    Duval, Eugenie
    von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G.
    Lecorps, Benjamin
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (10): : 1 - 23
  • [34] Assessment of welfare indicators in dairy farms offering pasture at differing levels
    Armbrecht, L.
    Lambertz, C.
    Albers, D.
    Gauly, M.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2019, 13 (10) : 2336 - 2347
  • [35] Reliability of sampling strategies for measuring dairy cattle welfare on commercial farms
    Van Os, Jennifer M. C.
    Winckler, Christoph
    Trieb, Julia
    Matarazzo, Soraia V.
    Lehenbauer, Terry W.
    Champagne, John D.
    Tucker, Cassandra B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (02) : 1495 - 1504
  • [36] Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare
    Poisky, Liam
    von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2017, 100 (11) : 8645 - 8657
  • [37] Assessment time of the Welfare Quality® protocol for dairy cattle
    de Vries, M.
    Engel, B.
    den Uijl, I.
    van Schaik, G.
    Dijkstra, T.
    de Boer, I. J. M.
    Bokkers, E. A. M.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2013, 22 (01) : 85 - 93
  • [38] Behavior indicators and stunning signs used to assess animal welfare during cattle slaughter
    Romero Penuela, Marlyn Hellen
    Fernando Uribe-Velasquez, Luis
    Sanchez Valencia, Jorge Alberto
    [J]. VETERINARIA Y ZOOTECNIA, 2013, 7 (02): : 8 - 27
  • [39] Welfare assessment methods and critical points for dairy cattle
    Bond, Guilherme Borges
    de Almeida, Rodrigo
    Ostrensky, Andre
    Maiolino Molento, Carla Forte
    [J]. CIENCIA RURAL, 2012, 42 (07): : 1286 - 1293
  • [40] Effects of Separation of Cows and Calves on Reproductive Performance and Animal Welfare in Tropical Beef Cattle
    Orihuela, Agustin
    Galina, Carlos S.
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (05):