Evaluation of a Novel Commercial Assay for the Determination of Cyclosporine A, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, and Everolimus by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometric Assay

被引:23
|
作者
Becker, Susen [1 ]
Thiery, Joachim [1 ]
Ceglarek, Uta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Inst Lab Med Clin Chem & Mol Diagnost, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
tandem mass spectrometry; cyclosporine A; tacrolimus; sirolimus; everolimus; HPLC-MS/MS METHOD; SIMULTANEOUS QUANTIFICATION; HUMAN BLOOD; IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS; ROBUST;
D O I
10.1097/FTD.0b013e318274827d
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was the evaluation of the first commercially available in-vitro diagnostic (IVD)-mass spectrometric immunosuppressant assay from Chromsystems (MassTox Immunosuppressants ONEMINUTE Test) and the comparison to a routinely used online solid phase extraction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric assay method for the measurement of cyclosporine A, everolimus, sirolimus, and tacrolimus in patient whole blood samples. Methods: An API 4000 [tandem mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX)] combined with a CTC Pal autosampler (CTC Analytics AG) and a Shimadzu ultra-fast liquid chromatography (UFLC) system were applied for the direct liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric assay analysis using electrospray ionization in positive ion mode. Isotope-labeled internal standards were used for the commercial assay. Within-and between-day variation, accuracy, and limits of quantification were determined. Samples from external international proficiency testing schemes were measured to assess the accuracy of the commercial assay. About 100 patient samples were reanalyzed with the commercial test kit, and the results were compared with our in-house results. Results: The limit of quantification for the commercial assay was 0.5 ng/mL for everolimus, sirolimus, and tacrolimus and 5 ng/mL for cyclosporine A. The coefficient of variation for all immunosuppressants was lower than 7% (within day) and 12% (between days) for all 5 concentration levels. Accuracy ranged between 82% and 111% for quality control samples and between 89% and 112% for samples from the external quality assurance program. Both methods showed a very good agreement (r > 0.91) in patient samples over the whole concentration range for all immunosuppressants. Conclusion: The commercial immunosuppressant assay from Chromsystems represents a standardized IVD-certified alternative to our in-house developed assay.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 132
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determination of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometry: Assessment of matrix effects and assay performance
    Vethe, Nils T.
    Gjerdalen, Laila C.
    Bergan, Stein
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2010, 70 (08): : 583 - 591
  • [2] Salting Out-Assisted Liquid-Liquid Extraction for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Measurement of Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, Everolimus, and Cyclosporine a in Whole Blood
    Kvamsoe, Marianne M.
    Hansen, Kristina R.
    Skadberg, Oyvind
    Vethe, Nils T.
    Brede, Cato
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2020, 42 (05) : 695 - 701
  • [3] Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for determination cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and MPA in blood
    Brozmanova, H.
    Urinovska, R.
    Perinova, I
    Budakova, L.
    Grundmann, M.
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2011, 33 (04) : 540 - 540
  • [4] Simultaneous quantification of sirolimus, everolimus, tacrolimus and cyclosporine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)
    Deters, M
    Kirchner, G
    Resch, K
    Kaever, V
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2002, 40 (03) : 285 - 292
  • [5] Accuracy evaluation of automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for everolimus and sirolimus compared to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
    Lee, Eun Jin
    Kim, Hyun-Ki
    Ahn, Sunyoung
    Lee, Woochang
    Kim, Hyun Soo
    Chun, Sail
    Min, Won-Ki
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2019, 33 (07)
  • [6] Analysis of cyclosporin A, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and everolimus in dried blood spot samples using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
    den Burger, J. C. G.
    Wilhelm, A. J.
    Chahbouni, A.
    Vos, R. M.
    Sinjewel, A.
    Swart, E. L.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 404 (6-7) : 1803 - 1811
  • [7] Analysis of cyclosporin A, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and everolimus in dried blood spot samples using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
    J. C. G. den Burger
    A. J. Wilhelm
    A. Chahbouni
    R. M. Vos
    A. Sinjewel
    E. L. Swart
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2012, 404 : 1803 - 1811
  • [8] Evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT i2000 Sirolimus Assay and Comparison With the Abbott IMx Sirolimus Assay and an Established Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method
    Johnson-Davis, Kamisha L.
    De, Soumo
    Jimenez, Ernest
    McMillin, Gwendolyn A.
    De, Barun K.
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2011, 33 (04) : 453 - 459
  • [9] Ultra Fast Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Routine Method for Simultaneous Determination of Cyclosporin A, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, and Everolimus in Whole Blood Using Deuterated Internal Standards for Cyclosporin A and Everolimus
    Meinitzer, Andreas
    Gartner, Gabriele
    Pilz, Stefan
    Stettin, Mariana
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2010, 32 (01) : 61 - 66
  • [10] Accuracy evaluation of Roche and Siemens tacrolimus and cyclosporine assays in comparison with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
    Ko, Dae-Hyun
    Cho, Eun-Jung
    Lee, Woochang
    Chun, Sail
    Min, Won-Ki
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 78 (06): : 431 - 438