Patients' preference for administration of endocrine treatments by injection or tablets: results from a study of women with breast cancer

被引:135
作者
Fallowfield, L [1 ]
Atkins, L [1 ]
Catt, S [1 ]
Cox, A [1 ]
Coxon, C [1 ]
Langridge, C [1 ]
Morris, R [1 ]
Price, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Canc Res UK, Sussex Psychosocial Oncol Grp, Brighton BN1 9QG, E Sussex, England
关键词
breast cancer; fulvestrant injections; patient preferences; tablet adherence;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdj044
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Endocrine therapies for advanced breast cancer include tablets and intramuscular injections. When treatments have similar efficacy and tolerability profiles, addressing preferences about routes of administration is important. Patients and methods: Two hundred and eight women > 2 years post-breast cancer diagnosis were interviewed about their preferences for daily tablets or monthly intramuscular injections. Health-care professionals treating the women estimated patients' preferences. Results: Sixty-three per cent of patients preferred tablets, 24.5% preferred the injection and 12.5% had no preference. The most cited reasons for tablet preference were convenience and dislike of needles; for injection preference, adherence and convenience. Variables associated with preferences were body mass index, educational level, attitudes towards injections and efficacy perceptions. Estimates about patients' preferences by health-care professionals varied widely. When asked to imagine scenarios where injections produced fewer hot flushes, or where two injections monthly improved efficacy, injection preference increased to 60.6% and 74.5%, respectively. Disturbingly, similar to 50% of patients admitted they sometimes forgot or chose not to take their current oral medication. Conclusions: The majority of breast cancer patients preferred hormone therapy via daily tablets rather than monthly injections. Information about side-effects or improved efficacy altered these preferences. Adherence to treatment cannot be assumed; patients' preferences about drug administration may influence this.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 210
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   The epidemiology of blood-injection-injury phobia [J].
Bienvenu, OJ ;
Eaton, WW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (05) :1129-1136
[2]  
Borner M, 2001, ONCOLOGIST, V6, P12
[3]   Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin:: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer [J].
Borner, MM ;
Schöffski, P ;
de Wit, R ;
Caponigro, F ;
Comella, G ;
Sulkes, A ;
Greim, G ;
Peters, GJ ;
van der Born, K ;
Wanders, J ;
de Boer, RF ;
Martin, C ;
Fumoleau, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (03) :349-358
[4]  
COX K, 2004, SYSTEMATIC REV 2 WAY
[5]   Adjuvant tamoxifen: Predictors of use, side effects, and discontinuation in older women [J].
Demissie, S ;
Silliman, RA ;
Lash, TL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (02) :322-328
[6]   Same gain, less pain: potential patient preferences for adjuvant treatment in premenopausal women with early breast cancer [J].
Fallowfield, L ;
McGurk, R ;
Dixon, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (16) :2403-2410
[7]  
FALLOWFIELD LJ, 1994, BREAST, V3, P202
[8]  
HAMILTON JG, 1995, J FAM PRACTICE, V41, P169
[9]   Comparison of Fulvestrant versus tamoxifen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women previously untreated with endocrine therapy: A multinational, double-blind, randomized trial [J].
Howell, A ;
Robertson, JE ;
Abram, P ;
Lichinitser, MR ;
Elledge, R ;
Bajetta, E ;
Watanabe, T ;
Morris, C ;
Webster, A ;
Dimery, I ;
Osborne, CK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (09) :1605-1613
[10]   Prescribing and taking medicines - Concordance is a fine theory but is mostly not being practised [J].
Jones, G .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7419) :819-819