Active inference, attention, and motor preparation

被引:119
作者
Brown, Harriet [1 ]
Friston, Karl J. [1 ]
Bestmann, Sven [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Wellcome Trust Ctr Neuroimaging, London, England
[2] UCL, Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
priming; motor preparation; action selection; attention; precision; free energy; active inference; SPATIAL ATTENTION; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; NEURAL MECHANISMS; COORDINATE SYSTEM; VISUAL-CORTEX; DIRECTION; REPRESENTATIONS; MODULATION; EEG;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00218
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Perception is the foundation of cognition and is fundamental to our beliefs and consequent action planning. The Editorial (this issue) asks: "what mechanisms, if any, mediate between perceptual and cognitive processes?" It has recently been argued that attention might furnish such a mechanism. In this paper, we pursue the idea that action planning (motor preparation) is an attentional phenomenon directed toward kinesthetic signals. This rests on a view of motor control as active inference, where predictions of proprioceptive signals are fulfilled by peripheral motor reflexes. If valid, active inference suggests that attention should not be limited to the optimal biasing of perceptual signals in the exteroceptive (e.g., visual) domain but should also bias proprioceptive signals during movement. Here, we investigate this idea using a classical attention (Posner) paradigm cast in a motor setting. Specially, we looked for decreases in reaction times when movements were preceded by valid relative to invalid cues. Furthermore, we addressed the hierarchical level at which putative attentional effects were expressed by independently cueing the nature of the movement and the hand used to execute it. We found a significant interaction between the validity of movement and effector cues on reaction times. This suggests that attentional bias might be mediated at a low level in the motor hierarchy, in an intrinsic frame of reference. This finding is consistent with attentional enabling of top-down predictions of proprioceptive input and may rely upon the same synaptic mechanisms that mediate directed spatial attention in the visual system.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, PERSPECTIVES PERCEPT
[2]   Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping [J].
Baldauf, Daniel ;
Deubel, Heiner .
VISION RESEARCH, 2010, 50 (11) :999-1013
[3]   Influence of uncertainty and surprise on human corticospinal excitability during preparation for action [J].
Bestmann, Sven ;
Harrison, Lee M. ;
Blankenburg, Felix ;
Mars, Rogier B. ;
Haggard, Patrick ;
Friston, Karl J. ;
Rothwell, John C. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (10) :775-780
[4]   Neural Mechanisms for Interacting with a World Full of Action Choices [J].
Cisek, Paul ;
Kalaska, John F. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, VOL 33, 2010, 33 :269-298
[5]   Action for perception:: A motor-visual attentional effect [J].
Craighero, L ;
Fadiga, L ;
Rizzolatti, G ;
Umiltà, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1999, 25 (06) :1673-1692
[6]   High resolution DC EEG of the bereitschaftspotential preceding anatomically congruent versus spatially congruent bimanual finger movements [J].
Cui, RQ ;
Deecke, L .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 1999, 12 (02) :117-127
[7]   Time to act and attend to the real mechanisms of action and attention [J].
Dalrymple, Kirsten A. ;
Kingstone, Alan .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 101 :213-216
[8]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72
[9]   Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism [J].
Deubel, H ;
Schneider, WX .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (12) :1827-1837
[10]   Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions [J].
Fagioli, Sabrina ;
Hommel, Bernhard ;
Schubotz, Ricarda Ines .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2007, 71 (01) :22-29