Drug monitoring of sunitinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: a monocentric observational French study

被引:22
作者
Cabel, Luc [1 ,2 ]
Blanchet, Benoit [3 ]
Thomas-Schoemann, Audrey [3 ,4 ]
Huillard, Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Bellesoeur, Audrey [3 ]
Cessot, Anatole [1 ,2 ]
Giroux, Julie [1 ,2 ]
Boudou-Rouquette, Pascaline [1 ,2 ]
Coriat, Romain [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Vidal, Michel [3 ,4 ]
Saidu, Nathaniel E. B. [5 ]
Golmard, Lisa [8 ]
Alexandre, Jerome [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Goldwasser, Francois [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cochin Hosp, AP HP, Dept Med Oncol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Paris Descartes Univ, CARPEM, Paris, France
[3] Cochin Hosp, Grp Pharmacol Clin Oncol, Dept Pharmacocokinet & Pharmacochem, F-75014 Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris 05, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cite, UFR Pharm, UMR8638,CNRS, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris 05, Sorbonne Paris Cite, UMR S1016, U1016,INSERM,UMR 8104,CNRS, Paris, France
[6] Cochin Hosp, AP HP, Dept Gastroenterol, F-75014 Paris, France
[7] Paris Descartes Univ, CARPEM, F-75006 Paris, France
[8] St Louis Hosp, Dept Biol Pharmacol, F-75010 Paris, France
关键词
oral anticancer agents; PK/PD relationship; renal-cell carcinoma; sunitinib; therapeutic drug monitoring; toxicity management; RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; TACROLIMUS BLOOD-LEVELS; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT; IMMUNOSUPPRESSANT THERAPY; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; NONADHERENCE; VARIABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1111/fcp.12327
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could be helpful in oral targeted therapies. Data are sparse to evaluate its impact on treatment management. This study aimed to determine a threshold value of plasma drug exposure associated with the occurrence of grade 3-4 toxicity, then the potential impact of TDM on clinical decision. Consecutive outpatients treated with sunitinib were prospectively monitored between days 21 and 28 of the first cycle, then monthly until disease progression. At each consultation, the composite AUC(T,ss) (sunitinib + active metabolite SU12662) was assayed. The decisions taken during each consultation were matched with AUC(T,ss) and compared to the decisional algorithm based on TDM. A total of 105 cancer patients and 288 consultations were matched with the closest AUC(T,ss) measurement. The majority (60%) of the patients had metastatic renal clear-cell carcinoma (mRCC). Fifty-five (52%) patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity. Multivariate analysis identified composite AUC(T,ss) as a parameter independently associated with grade 3-4 toxicity (P < 0.0001). Using the ROC curve, the threshold value of composite AUC(T,ss) predicting grade >= 3 toxicity was 2150 ng/mL/h (CI 95%, 0.6-0.79%; P < 0.0001). At disease progression in patients with mRCC, AUC(T,ss) tended to be lower than the one assayed during the first cycle (1678 vs. 2004 ng/mL/h, respectively, P = 0.072). TDM could have changed the medical decision for sunitinib dosing in 30% of patients at the first cycle of treatment, and in 46% of the patients over the whole treatment course. TDM is routinely feasible and may both contribute to improve toxicity management and to identify sunitinib underexposure at the time of disease progression.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 107
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Comparison between Two Generic Questionnaires to Assess Satisfaction with Medication in Chronic Diseases
    Delestras, Stephanie
    Roustit, Matthieu
    Bedouch, Pierrick
    Minoves, Melanie
    Dobremez, Valerie
    Mazet, Roseline
    Lehmann, Audrey
    Baudrant, Magalie
    Allenet, Benoit
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):
  • [12] Prevalence, consequences, and determinants of nonadherence in adult renal transplant patients:: a literature review
    Denhaerynck, K
    Dobbels, F
    Cleemput, I
    Desmyttere, A
    Schäfer-Keller, P
    Schaub, S
    De Geest, S
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 18 (10) : 1121 - 1133
  • [13] Rates and risk factors for nonadherence to the medical regimen after adult solid organ transplantation
    Dew, Mary Amanda
    DiMartini, Andrea F.
    Dabbs, Annette De Vito
    Myaskovsky, Larissa
    Steel, Jennifer
    Unruh, Mark
    Switzer, Galen E.
    Zomak, Rachelle
    Kormos, Robert L.
    Greenhouse, Joel B.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (07) : 858 - 873
  • [14] Adherence with immunosuppressive treatment after transplantation: results from the French trial PREDICT
    Dharancy, Sebastien
    Giral, Magali
    Tetaz, Rachel
    Fatras, Michel
    Dubel, Laurence
    Pageaux, Georges-Philippe
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 26 (03) : E293 - E299
  • [15] The Psychometric Properties and Practicability of Self-Report Instruments to Identify Medication Nonadherence in Adult Transplant Patients: A Systematic Review
    Dobbels, Fabienne
    Berben, Lut
    De Geest, Sabina
    Drent, Gerda
    Lennerling, Annette
    Whittaker, Clare
    Kugler, Christiane
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 90 (02) : 205 - 219
  • [16] Nonadherence Consensus Conference Summary Report
    Fine, R. N.
    Becker, Y.
    De Geest, S.
    Eisen, H.
    Ettenger, R.
    Evans, R.
    Rudow, D. Lapointe
    McKay, D.
    Neu, A.
    Nevins, T.
    Reyes, J.
    Wray, J.
    Dobbels, F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [17] French Health Care System, EPIC SCOR INT
  • [18] Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: A systematic review
    Garfield, Sara
    Clifford, Sarah
    Eliasson, Lina
    Barber, Nick
    Willson, Alan
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
  • [19] Nonadherent Behaviors After Solid Organ Transplantation
    Germani, G.
    Lazzaro, S.
    Gnoato, F.
    Senzolo, M.
    Borella, V.
    Rupolo, G.
    Cillo, U.
    Rigotti, P.
    Feltrin, G.
    Loy, M.
    Martin, A.
    Sturniolo, G. C.
    Burra, P.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 43 (01) : 318 - 323
  • [20] Girerd X, 2001, PRESSE MED, V30, P1044