Drug monitoring of sunitinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: a monocentric observational French study

被引:22
作者
Cabel, Luc [1 ,2 ]
Blanchet, Benoit [3 ]
Thomas-Schoemann, Audrey [3 ,4 ]
Huillard, Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Bellesoeur, Audrey [3 ]
Cessot, Anatole [1 ,2 ]
Giroux, Julie [1 ,2 ]
Boudou-Rouquette, Pascaline [1 ,2 ]
Coriat, Romain [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Vidal, Michel [3 ,4 ]
Saidu, Nathaniel E. B. [5 ]
Golmard, Lisa [8 ]
Alexandre, Jerome [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Goldwasser, Francois [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cochin Hosp, AP HP, Dept Med Oncol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Paris Descartes Univ, CARPEM, Paris, France
[3] Cochin Hosp, Grp Pharmacol Clin Oncol, Dept Pharmacocokinet & Pharmacochem, F-75014 Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris 05, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cite, UFR Pharm, UMR8638,CNRS, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris 05, Sorbonne Paris Cite, UMR S1016, U1016,INSERM,UMR 8104,CNRS, Paris, France
[6] Cochin Hosp, AP HP, Dept Gastroenterol, F-75014 Paris, France
[7] Paris Descartes Univ, CARPEM, F-75006 Paris, France
[8] St Louis Hosp, Dept Biol Pharmacol, F-75010 Paris, France
关键词
oral anticancer agents; PK/PD relationship; renal-cell carcinoma; sunitinib; therapeutic drug monitoring; toxicity management; RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; TACROLIMUS BLOOD-LEVELS; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT; IMMUNOSUPPRESSANT THERAPY; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; NONADHERENCE; VARIABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1111/fcp.12327
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could be helpful in oral targeted therapies. Data are sparse to evaluate its impact on treatment management. This study aimed to determine a threshold value of plasma drug exposure associated with the occurrence of grade 3-4 toxicity, then the potential impact of TDM on clinical decision. Consecutive outpatients treated with sunitinib were prospectively monitored between days 21 and 28 of the first cycle, then monthly until disease progression. At each consultation, the composite AUC(T,ss) (sunitinib + active metabolite SU12662) was assayed. The decisions taken during each consultation were matched with AUC(T,ss) and compared to the decisional algorithm based on TDM. A total of 105 cancer patients and 288 consultations were matched with the closest AUC(T,ss) measurement. The majority (60%) of the patients had metastatic renal clear-cell carcinoma (mRCC). Fifty-five (52%) patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity. Multivariate analysis identified composite AUC(T,ss) as a parameter independently associated with grade 3-4 toxicity (P < 0.0001). Using the ROC curve, the threshold value of composite AUC(T,ss) predicting grade >= 3 toxicity was 2150 ng/mL/h (CI 95%, 0.6-0.79%; P < 0.0001). At disease progression in patients with mRCC, AUC(T,ss) tended to be lower than the one assayed during the first cycle (1678 vs. 2004 ng/mL/h, respectively, P = 0.072). TDM could have changed the medical decision for sunitinib dosing in 30% of patients at the first cycle of treatment, and in 46% of the patients over the whole treatment course. TDM is routinely feasible and may both contribute to improve toxicity management and to identify sunitinib underexposure at the time of disease progression.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 107
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] [Anonymous], ILLNESS PERCEPTION Q
  • [3] Factors relevant to medication non-adherence in kidney transplant: a systematic review
    Belaiche, Stephanie
    Decaudin, Bertrand
    Dharancy, Sebastien
    Noel, Christian
    Odou, Pascal
    Hazzan, Marc
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2017, 39 (03) : 582 - 593
  • [4] Evaluation of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Drugs in Kidney Transplantation by Control of Medication Dispensing
    Brahm, M. M. T.
    Manfro, R. C.
    Mello, D.
    Cioato, S.
    Goncalves, L. F. S.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (08) : 2391 - 2393
  • [5] Kidney Transplantation Complications Related to Psychiatric or Neurological Disorders
    Carrasco, F. R.
    Moreno, A.
    Ridao, N.
    Calvo, N.
    Perez-Flores, I.
    Rodriguez, A.
    Sanchez, A.
    Marques, M.
    Barrientos
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 41 (06) : 2430 - 2432
  • [6] Predicting adherence to immunosuppressant therapy: a prospective analysis of the theory of planned behaviour
    Chisholm, Marie A.
    Williamson, Gail M.
    Lance, Charles E.
    Mulloy, Laura L.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 22 (08) : 2339 - 2348
  • [7] Improving Outcomes of Renal Transplant Recipients With Behavioral Adherence Contracts: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chisholm-Burns, M. A.
    Spivey, C. A.
    Zivin, J. Graff
    Lee, J. K.
    Sredzinski, E.
    Tolley, E. A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 (09) : 2364 - 2373
  • [8] Social support and immunosuppressant therapy adherence among adult renal transplant recipients
    Chisholm-Burns, Marie A.
    Spivey, Christina A.
    Wilks, Scott E.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 24 (03) : 312 - 320
  • [9] Factors Predictive of Medication Nonadherence After Renal Transplantation: A French Observational Study
    Couzi, Lionel
    Moulin, Bruno
    Morin, Marie-Pascale
    Albano, Laetitia
    Godin, Michel
    Barrou, Benoit
    Alamartine, Eric
    Morelon, Emmanuel
    Girardot-Seguin, Sandrine
    Mendes, Laurence
    Misdrahi, David
    Cassuto, Elisabeth
    Merville, Pierre
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 95 (02) : 326 - 332
  • [10] TRANSPLANTATION Increasing adherence to immunosuppression: a clinical priority
    De Geest, Sabina
    Dobbels, Fabienne
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 6 (03) : 139 - 140