Environmental Tax Reform: Principles from Theory and Practice

被引:23
作者
Parry, Ian W. H. [1 ]
Norregaard, John [1 ]
Heine, Dirk [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Dept, Washington, DC 20431 USA
[2] E3 Fdn, Cambridge CB5 8AF, England
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 4 | 2012年 / 4卷
关键词
environmental taxes; design principles; externalities; fuel taxes; country evaluation; PARTICULATE AIR-POLLUTION; TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; CO2; ABATEMENT; EXTERNALITIES; EMISSIONS; INCOME; COSTS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-resource-110811-114509
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
On the basis of the environmental tax literature, this article recommends a system of upstream taxes on fossil fuels, combined with refunds for downstream emissions capture, to reduce carbon and local pollution emissions. Motor fuel taxes should also account for congestion and other externalities associated with vehicle use, at least until mileage-based taxes are widely introduced. An examination of existing energy/environmental tax systems in Germany, Sweden, Turkey, and Vietnam suggests that there is substantial scope for policy reform. Policy options include harmonizing taxes for pollution content across different fuels and end users, better aligning tax rates with (albeit crude) values for externalities, and scaling back excise taxes on vehicle ownership and electricity use that are redundant (on environmental grounds) in the presence of more targeted taxes.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 125
页数:28
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Agell J, 1996, NATL TAX J, V49, P643
[2]  
Andersen MikaelSkou., 2009, Carbon energy taxation. Lessons from Europe
[3]  
[Anonymous], GREEN EC NORD EXP
[4]  
[Anonymous], ENV TAX REF IN PRESS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, WORLD EN OUTL 2011
[6]  
[Anonymous], GESAMTWIRTSCHAFTLICH
[7]  
[Anonymous], FOSS FUEL SUPP
[8]  
[Anonymous], NEW US NUCL GENERATI
[9]  
[Anonymous], EC INSTRUMENTS PRACT
[10]  
[Anonymous], GREEN PAP MARK BAS I