Larval sensilla of the moth Heliothis virescens respond to sex pheromone components

被引:21
|
作者
Zielonka, M. [1 ]
Gehrke, P. [1 ]
Badeke, E. [2 ]
Sachse, S. [2 ]
Breer, H. [1 ]
Krieger, J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Physiol, Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Chem Ecol, Dept Evolutionary Neuroethol, Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Biol Zool, Dept Anim Physiol, D-06099 Halle, Saale, Germany
关键词
olfaction; moth; pheromone detection; larvae; ODORANT-BINDING-PROTEIN; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR NEURONS; DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION; FUNCTIONAL-CHARACTERIZATION; MEMBRANE-PROTEINS; BOMBYX-MORI; IDENTIFICATION; GENES; IMMUNOLOCALIZATION; LEPIDOPTERA;
D O I
10.1111/imb.12253
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Female-released sex pheromones orchestrate the mating behaviour of moths. Recent studies have shown that sex pheromones not only attract adult males but also caterpillars. Single sensillum recordings revealed that larval antennal sensilla of the moth Heliothis virescens respond to specific sex pheromone components. In search for the molecular basis of pheromone detection in larvae, we found that olfactory sensilla on the larval antennae are equipped with the same molecular elements that mediate sex pheromone detection in adult male moths, including the Heliothis virescens receptors 6 (HR6) and HR13, as well as sensory neurone membrane protein 1 (SNMP1). Thirty-eight olfactory sensory neurones were identified in three large sensilla basiconica; six of these are considered as candidate pheromone responsive cells based on the expression of SNMP1. The pheromone receptor HR6 was found to be expressed in two cells and the receptor HR13 in three cells. These putative pheromone responsive neurones were accompanied by cells expressing pheromone-binding protein 1 (PBP1) and PBP2. The results indicate that the responsiveness of larval sensilla to female-emitted sex pheromones is based on the same molecular machinery as in the antennae of adult males.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 678
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Molecular elements of pheromone detection in the female moth, Heliothis virescens
    Zielonka, Monika
    Breer, Heinz
    Krieger, Juergen
    INSECT SCIENCE, 2018, 25 (03) : 389 - 400
  • [2] Expression of a pheromone receptor in ovipositor sensilla of the female moth (Heliothis virescens)
    Widmayer, P.
    Heifetz, Y.
    Breer, H.
    INSECT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2009, 18 (04) : 541 - 547
  • [3] Lipid analysis of the sex pheromone gland of the moth Heliothis virescens
    Foster, SP
    ARCHIVES OF INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 59 (02) : 80 - 90
  • [4] Plant odorants interfere with detection of sex pheromone signals by male Heliothis virescens
    Pregitzer, Pablo
    Schubert, Marco
    Breer, Heinz
    Hansson, Bill S.
    Sachse, Silke
    Krieger, Juergen
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6 : 1 - 17
  • [5] Transcriptome analysis of the sex pheromone gland of the noctuid moth Heliothis virescens
    Heiko Vogel
    Andrew J Heidel
    David G Heckel
    Astrid T Groot
    BMC Genomics, 11
  • [6] Transcriptome analysis of the sex pheromone gland of the noctuid moth Heliothis virescens
    Vogel, Heiko
    Heidel, Andrew J.
    Heckel, David G.
    Groot, Astrid T.
    BMC GENOMICS, 2010, 11
  • [7] Synthetic rates of key stored fatty acids in the biosynthesis of sex pheromone in the moth Heliothis virescens
    Foster, Stephen P.
    Anderson, Karin G.
    INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2012, 42 (11) : 865 - 872
  • [8] The fate of topically applied fatty acids in the sex pheromone gland of the moth Heliothis virescens
    Foster, SP
    INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 35 (09) : 1021 - 1031
  • [9] Specificity of the receptor for the major sex pheromone component in Heliothis virescens
    Vasquez, Gissella M.
    Syed, Zainulabeuddin
    Estes, Patricia A.
    Leal, Walter S.
    Gould, Fred
    JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE, 2013, 13
  • [10] PHEROMONE RECEPTION IN TOBACCO BUDWORM MOTH, HELIOTHIS-VIRESCENS
    ALMAAS, TJ
    MUSTAPARTA, H
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1990, 16 (04) : 1331 - 1347