A GIS-based evaluation method of underground space resources for urban spatial planning: Part 1 methodology

被引:112
作者
Peng, Jian
Peng, Fang-Le [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Res Ctr Underground Space, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Urban Underground Space (UUS); Evaluation method; Urban spatial planning; GIS; Resource's Comprehensive Quality (RCQ); Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); LAND-USE; POPULATION; SHANGHAI; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.002
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Urban underground space (UUS) has been playing an important role in the urban development in recent years. The evaluation for its potential becomes essential for urban spatial planning. Previous research emphasized the fundamental data, while this paper not only emphasized the data provided by related departments, but also took into consideration the gap and relation between UUS and urban spatial planning. To provide theoretical support for urban spatial planning, this paper studied a method for evaluating UUS. In this method, an index system for UUS resource evaluation was put forward and its analytical process was based on the Geographic Information System (GIS) and some mathematical tools, such as the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the most unfavorable grading method (MUGM) and the exclusive method (EM). Then this method was applied to UUS Master Plans and Detailed Regulatory Planning in Chinese cities, and proved to be relatively practicable. The research outcomes are presented in the form of two papers, each with a different focus. Part 1 aims to introduce the evaluation methodology, including construction suitability evaluation & potential value evaluation & volume estimation. Part 2 reports on applications of the method to Chinese cities of Tongren and Changzhou. Part 1 analyzed the concept behind and the process involved in the UUS spatial planning evaluation methodology, combining construction suitability evaluation & potential value evaluation & volume estimation. Based on the factors that influence the development and utilization of a UUS, an index system for UUS resource evaluation is presented. Its primary components are construction suitability (including landform, geology, hydrogeology and the existing construction situation) and potential value (including urban spatial location and land use function). Using AHP, MUGM and EM, the level of each index was quantified and overlaid based on GIS, and then the UUS evaluation output was obtained, such as construction suitability distribution, Resource's comprehensive quality (RCQ) distribution, with manifestation styles of maps and tables. In this research, three models are proposed, including a construction suitability model, a comprehensive quality model and a volume estimation model. The construction suitability model can evaluate the construction difficulty or cost grade, while the comprehensive quality model can evaluate potential benefit grade of every part in the city. They reflect the formula "Quality = Potential - Cost" to some extent. On the other hand, the volume estimation model can calculate the urban indicators for UUS, which can give data support for urban spatial planning.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 95
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Allaby M., 2013, DICT GEOLOGY EARTH S
[2]   THE EFFECTS OF A NEW SUBWAY LINE ON HOUSING PRICES IN METROPOLITAN TORONTO [J].
BAJIC, V .
URBAN STUDIES, 1983, 20 (02) :147-158
[3]  
Beijing Engineering Consultants LTD, 2012, COD GEOENG SIT INV E
[4]  
Bobylev N., 2005, NEW TECHNOLOGIES URB, P499
[5]   Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using the analytic network process [J].
Bobylev, Nikolai .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 20 (08) :1030-1040
[6]   Underground space in the Alexanderplatz area, Berlin: Research into the quantification of urban underground space use [J].
Bobylev, Nikolai .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 25 (05) :495-507
[8]  
Chen Z., 2011, URBAN UNDERGROUND SP
[9]  
de Rienzo F, 2007, 11TH ACUUS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE - UNDERGROUND SPACE: EXPANDING THE FRONTIERS, P397
[10]  
Dorfman R., 1972, Models for Managing Regional Water Quality