Predicting spatial variability of selected soil properties using digital soil mapping in a rainfed vineyard of central Chile

被引:28
作者
Mashalaba, Lwando [1 ]
Galleguillos, Mauricio [2 ,3 ]
Seguel, Oscar [1 ]
Poblete-Olivares, Javiera [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Fac Ciencias Agron, Dept Ingn & Suelos, Casilla 1004, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Chile, Fac Ciencias Agron, Dept Ciencias Ambientales & Recursos Nat Renovabl, Santiago, Chile
[3] Ctr Climate & Resilience Res CR 2, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Digital soil mapping; Soil properties; Vineyard; Random Forest model; Environmental covariates; Remote sensing; Alfisols; PARTICLE-SIZE FRACTIONS; LEAF NITROGEN CONCENTRATION; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; ORGANIC-MATTER; RANDOM-FOREST; PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTIONS; HYDRAULIC-PROPERTIES; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; VEGETATION INDEXES; REGRESSION-TREE;
D O I
10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00289
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil physical properties influence vineyard behavior, therefore the knowledge of their spatial variability is essen tial for making vineyard management decisions. This study aimed to model and map selected soil properties by means of knowledge-based digital soil mapping approach. We used a Random Forest (RF) algorithm to link environmental covariates derived from a LiDAR flight and satellite spectral information, describing soil forming factors and ten selected soil properties (particle size distribution, bulk density, dispersion ratio, Ksat, field capacity, permanent wilting point, fast drainage pores and slow drainage pores) at three depth intervals, namely 0-20, 20- 40, and 40-60 cm at a systematic grid (60 x 60 m(2)). The descriptive statistics showed low to very high variability within the field. RF model of particle size distribution, and bulk density performed well, although the models could not reliably predict saturated hydraulic conductivity. There was a better prediction performance (based on 34% model validation) in the upper depth intervals than the lower depth intervals (e.g., R-2 of 0.66; nRMSE of 27.5% for clay content at 0-20 cm and R-2 of 0.51; nRMSE of 16% at 40-60 cm). There was a better prediction performance in the lower depth intervals than the upper depth intervals (e.g., R-2 of 0.49; nRMSE of 23% for dispersion ratio at 0-20 cm and R-2 of 0.81; nRMSE of 30% at 40-60 cm). RF model overestimated areas with low values and underestimated areas with high values. Further analysis suggested that Topographic position Index, Topographic Wetness Index, aspect, slope length factor, modified catchment area, catchment slope, and longitudinal curvature were the dominant environmental covariates influencing prediction of soil properties. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 107 条
[21]   Organic matter influence on clay wettability and soil aggregate stability [J].
Chenu, C ;
Le Bissonnais, Y ;
Arrouays, D .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (04) :1479-1486
[22]  
CIREN, 1997, Estudio Agrologico de la VII Region, V117
[23]  
Conrad O., 2014, SYSTEM AUTOMATED GEO
[24]   Use of airborne gamma radiometric data for soil mapping [J].
Cook, SE ;
Corner, RJ ;
Groves, PR ;
Grealish, GJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1996, 34 (01) :183-194
[25]   Predicting the thickness and aeolian fraction of soils in upland watersheds of the Mojave Desert [J].
Crouvi, Onn ;
Pelletier, Jon D. ;
Rasmussen, Craig .
GEODERMA, 2013, 195 :94-110
[26]  
Cruz JS, 2011, CIENC INVESTIG AGRAR, V38, P155
[27]  
Dane J.H., 2017, SSSA Book Series, V5, DOI [10.2136/sssabookser5.4, DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.4]
[28]   Spatial soil ecology [J].
Ettema, CH ;
Wardle, DA .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2002, 17 (04) :177-183
[29]  
Eynard A., 2006, P 18 WORLD C SOIL SC
[30]  
Felzensztein C., 2011, BALAS C U A IB SANT