Perceived Work Uncertainty and Creativity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Roles of Zhongyong and Creative Self-Efficacy

被引:33
作者
Tang, Chaoying [1 ]
Ma, Huijuan [1 ]
Naumann, Stefanie E. [2 ]
Xing, Ziwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Pacific, Eberhardt Sch Business, Stockton, CA 95211 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
creative self-efficacy; Zhongyong; perceived work uncertainty; employee creativity; COVID-19; FIT INDEXES; PARADOX; STRESS; PERSPECTIVE; INNOVATION; PRESSURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596232
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research on the relationship between work stress and employee creativity has been mixed. This study on 823 female attorneys in China identifies employee creative self-efficacy and employees' value of Zhongyong as moderators in this relationship. In this study, work stress is assessed by the perceived work uncertainty brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study found that although Zhongyong, which involves an employee's ambidextrous thinking, can be helpful for employee creativity, low levels of Zhongyong are better for employee creativity in an uncertain context such as the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the fact that high levels of Zhongyong result in an overemphasis on compromise and giving in when times are uncertain. Instead, low levels of Zhongyong will decrease employees' concern about others' acceptance in an uncertain environment. In addition, creative self-efficacy motivates employees to engage in creative efforts during times of work uncertainty. In sum, this study found that employee perceived work uncertainty brought on by COVID-19 enhances employee creativity when an employee's value of Zhongyong is low and creative self-efficacy is high.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   INCORPORATING PHYSIOLOGY INTO CREATIVITY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE: THE EFFECTS OF BODILY STRESS RESPONSES ON CREATIVITY IN ORGANIZATIONS [J].
Akinola, Modupe ;
Kapadia, Chaitali ;
Lu, Jackson G. ;
Mason, Malia F. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 33 (02) :163-184
[2]  
American Institute of Stress, 2017, ATT AM WORKPL 7 ANN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Multivariate Data Analysis
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.), DOI [10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787, DOI 10.15353/CGJSC.V1I1.3787]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) Manual
[6]   When Prevention Promotes Creativity: The Role of Mood, Regulatory Focus, and Regulatory Closure [J].
Baas, Matthijs ;
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. ;
Nijstad, Bernard A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 100 (05) :794-809
[7]   The Strength-of-Weak-Ties Perspective on Creativity: A Comprehensive Examination and Extension [J].
Baer, Markus .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (03) :592-601
[8]  
Brislin R. W., 1986, The Wording and Translation of Research Instruments, DOI [DOI 10.1177/017084068800900318, 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.644]
[9]   The Relationship Between Stressors and Creativity: A Meta-Analysis Examining Competing Theoretical Models [J].
Byron, Kristin ;
Khazanchi, Shalini ;
Nazarian, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (01) :201-212
[10]   Individual differences in Zhong-Yong tendency and processing capacity [J].
Chang, Ting- Yun ;
Yang, Cheng-Ta .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5