Quantitative Structure Property Relationship Model for Hydrocarbon Liquid Viscosity Prediction

被引:34
作者
Cai, Guangqing [1 ]
Liu, Zhefu [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Linzhou [1 ]
Zhao, Suoqi [1 ]
Xu, Chunming [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, State Key Lab Heavy Oil Proc, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Ctr Refining & Petrochem, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PURE-COMPONENT PROPERTIES; FRICTION THEORY; ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; HEAVY OILS; MIXTURES; TEMPERATURE; SOLVENTS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b04075
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The liquid viscosity of hydrocarbon compounds is essential in the chemical engineering process design and optimization. In this paper, we developed a quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) model to predict the hydrocarbon viscosity at different temperatures from the chemical structure. We collected viscosity data at different temperatures of 261 hydrocarbon compounds (C-3-C-64), covering n-paraffins, isoparaffins, olefins, allcynes, monocyclic and polycyclic cycloalkanes, and aromatics. We regressed the experimental data using an improved Andrade equation at first. Hydrocarbon viscosity versus temperature curves were characterized by only two parameters (named B and T-0). The QSPR model was then built to capture the complex dependence of the Andrade equation parameters upon the chemical structures. A total of 36 key chemical features (including 15 basic groups, 20 united groups, and molecular weights) were manually selected through the trial and-error process. An artificial neural network was trained to correlate the Andrade model parameters to the selected chemical features. The average relative errors for B and T-0 predictions are 2.87 and 1.05%, respectively. The viscosity versus temperature profile was calculated from the predicted Andrade model parameters, reaching the mean absolute error at a value of 0.10 mPa s. We also proved that the established QSPR model can describe the viscosity versus temperature profile of different isomers, such as isoparaffins, with different branch degrees and aromatic hydrocarbons with different substituent positions. At last, we applied the QSPR model to predict gasoline and diesel viscosities based on the measured molecular composition. A good agreement was observed between predicted and experimental data (absolute mean deviation equals 0.21 mPa s), demonstrating that it has capacity to calculate viscosity of hydrocarbon mixtures.
引用
收藏
页码:3290 / 3298
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   How not to develop a quantitative structure-activity or structure-property relationship (QSAR/QSPR) [J].
Dearden, J. C. ;
Cronin, M. T. D. ;
Kaiser, K. L. E. .
SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (3-4) :241-266
[32]   Robust mathematical models of structure and quantitative structure-property relationship studies of alkyl halides [J].
Berinde, Zoita ;
Butean, Claudia .
CARPATHIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2024, 40 (03) :607-622
[33]   Quantitative structure-property relationship for surface tension of some common alcohols [J].
Khajeh, Aboozar ;
Modarress, Hamid .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 2011, 25 (06) :333-339
[34]   Quantitative structure-property relationship for predicting the diffusion coefficient of ionic liquids [J].
Xiao, Yongjun ;
Song, Fan ;
An, Shuhao ;
Zeng, Fazhan ;
Xu, Yingjie ;
Peng, Changjun ;
Liu, Honglai .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS, 2022, 349
[35]   Nonlinear Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Modeling of Skin Permeation Coefficient [J].
Neely, Brian J. ;
Madihally, Sundararajan V. ;
Robinson, Robert L., Jr. ;
Gasem, Khaled A. M. .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 98 (11) :4069-4084
[36]   A Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Model for Predicting the Critical Pressures of Organic Compounds Containing Oxygen, Sulfur, and Nitrogen [J].
Oh, Ji Ye ;
Park, Kiho ;
Kim, Yangsoo ;
Park, Tae-Yun ;
Yang, Dae Ryook .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 2017, 50 (06) :397-407
[37]   Flash Point and Cetane Number Predictions for Fuel Compounds Using Quantitative Structure Property Relationship (QSPR) Methods [J].
Saldana, Diego Alonso ;
Starck, Laurie ;
Mougin, Pascal ;
Rousseau, Bernard ;
Pidol, Ludivine ;
Jeuland, Nicolas ;
Creton, Benoit .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2011, 25 (09) :3900-3908
[38]   Structure-property reduced order model for viscosity prediction in single-component CO2-binding organic liquids [J].
Cantu, David C. ;
Malhotra, Deepika ;
Koech, Phillip K. ;
Heldebrant, David J. ;
Zheng, Feng ;
Freeman, Charles J. ;
Rousseau, Roger ;
Glezakou, Vassiliki-Alexandra .
GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2016, 18 (22) :6004-6011
[39]   Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) models for Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE) prediction of combustible dusts using machine learning [J].
Chaudhari, Purvali ;
Ade, Nilesh ;
Perez, Lisa M. ;
Kolis, Stanley ;
Mashuga, Chad, V .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 372 :227-234
[40]   Further model development for prediction of viscosity of mixed oils [J].
Larki, Saeed Ashtari ;
Banashooshtari, Hooman .
PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 35 (23) :2221-2228