Corporate Structure and Performance Feedback: Aspirations and Adaptation in M-Form Firms

被引:182
作者
Gaba, Vibha [1 ]
Joseph, John [2 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, Singapore 138676, Singapore
[2] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
adaptation; performance feedback; multiple goals; M-form organization; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ARCHITECTURAL INNOVATION; STRATEGIC PERSISTENCE; RISK PREFERENCES; MODEL; INVESTMENT; ATTENTION; SEARCH; ORGANIZATIONS; INERTIA;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1120.0788
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this study, we examine how business units of multidivisional (M-form) firms adapt their activities in response to poor performance at the corporate and business unit levels. By linking performance feedback theory with theories of attention and M-form organizations, we show that corporate structure influences the relationship between performance below aspirations and business unit adaptation. Because corporate structure vertically differentiates performance goals and problemistic search, solutions to performance problems vary across corporate and business unit levels, with divergent implications for business unit adaptation. We examine business unit adaptation empirically through new product introductions in the global mobile device industry, finding that poor performance at the business unit level leads to greater new product introductions. In contrast, corporate-level responses to performance problems have a negative cross-level effect on new product introductions. We also find that these negative effects are attenuated for strategically significant business units, which have more input into corporate responses. By linking structural and behavioral drivers of action, this paper contributes to the knowledge and understanding of adaptive behavior in multidivisional firms.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1119
页数:18
相关论文
共 95 条
[21]  
Bower JosephL., 1970, MANAGING RESOURCE AL
[22]  
BROMILEY P, 1991, ACAD MANAGE J, V34, P37, DOI 10.5465/256301
[23]   PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT - PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J].
BROWN, SL ;
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (02) :343-378
[24]   Strategic dissonance [J].
Burgelman, RA ;
Grove, AS .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 38 (02) :8-+
[25]   Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in [J].
Burgelman, RA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 47 (02) :325-357
[26]   INTRAORGANIZATIONAL ECOLOGY OF STRATEGY MAKING AND ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION: THEORY AND FIELD RESEARCH [J].
Burgelman, Robert A. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1991, 2 (03) :239-262
[27]  
Bushee BJ, 1998, ACCOUNT REV, V73, P305
[28]  
Cameron A. C., 2005, Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications
[29]  
Chakravarthy B.S., 1982, Academy of Management Review, V7, P35
[30]  
Chandler A.D., 1962, STRATEGY STRUCTURE C