Quantitative DWI implemented after DCE-MRI yields increased specificity for BI-RADS 3 and 4 breast lesions

被引:56
作者
Dijkstra, Hildebrand [1 ,2 ]
Dorrius, Monique D. [1 ,2 ]
Wielema, Mirjam [1 ,2 ]
Pijnappel, Ruud M. [3 ]
Oudkerk, Matthijs [1 ]
Sijens, Paul E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Med Imaging North East Netherlands, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
diffusion weighted MRI; breast; cancer; diagnostic techniques and procedures; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; IMAGING BIOMARKER; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; BENIGN; DIFFERENTIATION; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25331
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo assess if specificity can be increased when semiautomated breast lesion analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is implemented after dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the workup of BI-RADS 3 and 4 breast lesions larger than 1cm. Materials and MethodsIn all, 120 consecutive patients (mean-age, 48 years; age range, 23-75 years) with 139 breast lesions (1cm) were examined (2010-2014) with 1.5T DCE-MRI and DWI (b=0, 50, 200, 500, 800, 1000 s/mm(2)) and the BI-RADS classification and histopathology were obtained. For each lesion malignancy was excluded using voxelwise semiautomated breast lesion analysis based on previously defined thresholds for the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the three intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters: molecular diffusion (D-slow), microperfusion (D-fast), and the fraction of D-fast (f(fast)). The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and negative predictive value (NPV) based on only IVIM parameters combined in parallel (D-slow, D-fast, and f(fast)), or the ADC or the BI-RADS classification by DCE-MRI were compared. Subsequently, the Se, Sp, and NPV of the combination of the BI-RADS classification by DCE-MRI followed by the IVIM parameters in parallel (or the ADC) were compared. ResultsIn all, 23 of 139 breast lesions were benign. Se and Sp of DCE-MRI was 100% and 30.4% (NPV=100%). Se and Sp of IVIM parameters in parallel were 92.2% and 52.2% (NPV=57.1%) and for the ADC 95.7% and 17.4%, respectively (NPV=44.4%). In all, 26 of 139 lesions were classified as BI-RADS 3 (n=7) or BI-RADS 4 (n=19). DCE-MRI combined with ADC (Se=99.1%, Sp=34.8%) or IVIM (Se=99.1%, Sp=56.5%) did significantly improve (P=0.016) Sp of DCE-MRI alone for workup of BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions (NPV=92.9%). ConclusionQuantitative DWI has a lower NPV compared to DCE-MRI for evaluation of breast lesions and may therefore not be able to replace DCE-MRI; when implemented after DCE-MRI as problem solver for BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions, the combined specificity improves significantly. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1642-1649.
引用
收藏
页码:1642 / 1649
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Bickel H, 2015, INVEST RADIOL, V50, P95, DOI 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000104
[2]   Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement [J].
Cheng, Liuquan ;
Bai, Yuhan ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Liu, Mei ;
Li, Xiru ;
Zhang, Ailiang ;
Zhang, Xiaojing ;
Ma, Lin .
TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (03) :1537-1545
[3]   Semi-automated quantitative intravoxel incoherent motion analysis and its implementation in breast diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Dijkstra, Hildebrand ;
Dorrius, Monique D. ;
Wielema, Mirjam ;
Jaspers, Karolien ;
Pijnappel, Ruud M. ;
Oudkerk, Matthijs ;
Sijens, Paul E. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 43 (05) :1122-1131
[4]   The negative predictive value of breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in noncalcified BIRADS 3 lesions [J].
Dorrius, M. D. ;
Pijnappel, R. M. ;
Sijens, P. E. ;
van der Weide, M. C. Jansen ;
Oudkerk, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (02) :209-213
[5]   Integration of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI Quantitative Parameters for Breast Lesion Classification [J].
Fusco, Roberta ;
Sansone, Mario ;
Filice, Salvatore ;
Granata, Vincenza ;
Catalano, Orlando ;
Amato, Daniela Maria ;
Di Bonito, Maurizio ;
D'Aiuto, Massimiliano ;
Capasso, Immacolata ;
Rinaldo, Massimo ;
Petrillo, Antonella .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
[6]   MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast [J].
Gökalp, G ;
Topal, U .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (03) :436-444
[7]   Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Masses: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance Using Various Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Parameters [J].
Hirano, Maki ;
Satake, Hiroko ;
Ishigaki, Satoko ;
Ikeda, Mitsuru ;
Kawai, Hisashi ;
Naganawa, Shinji .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (03) :717-722
[8]   Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as an MR Imaging Biomarker of Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A Pilot Study [J].
Iima, Mami ;
Le Bihan, Denis ;
Okumura, Ryosuke ;
Okada, Tomohisa ;
Fujimoto, Koji ;
Kanao, Shotaro ;
Tanaka, Shiro ;
Fujimoto, Masakazu ;
Sakashita, Hiromi ;
Togashi, Kaori .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 260 (02) :364-372
[9]   Contribution of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Characterization of Breast Tumors [J].
Kul, Sibel ;
Cansu, Aysegul ;
Alhan, Etem ;
Dinc, Hasan ;
Gunes, Gurbuz ;
Reis, Abdulkadir .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (01) :210-217
[10]  
LesBihan D, 1991, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V1, P7