Routinely staging gastric cancer with 18F-FDG PET-CT detects additional metastases and predicts early recurrence and death after surgery

被引:72
作者
Findlay, John M. [1 ,2 ]
Antonowicz, Stefan [1 ]
Segaran, Ashvina [1 ]
el Kafsi, Jihene [1 ]
Zhang, Alexa [1 ]
Bradley, Kevin M. [3 ]
Gillies, Richard S. [1 ]
Maynard, Nicholas D. [1 ]
Middleton, Mark R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Churchill Hosp, Oxford OesophagoGastr Ctr, Oxford OX3 7LE, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Oncol, Old Rd Campus Res Bldg, Oxford OX3 7DQ, England
[3] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Churchill Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Oxford OX3 7LE, England
关键词
Cancer staging; PET-CT; Gastric cancer; Prognosis; Metastases; ESOPHAGEAL CANCER; ADENOCARCINOMA; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-018-5904-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesFluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is typically considered to have minimal yield in gastric cancer, and so is not consistently recommended by international guidelines. However, its yield is considerable in esophageal and junctional cancer, identifying unsuspected metastases and risk-stratifying patients using metabolic nodal stage (mN). We aimed to determine the contemporary utility of routine F-18-FDG PET-CT in gastric cancer.MethodsWe routinely stage patients with non-junctional gastric cancer with PET-CT, provided initial CT does not demonstrate unequivocal metastases. We performed a retrospective study of all such patients staged in our institution from January 2007 to July 2016. Our primary endpoint was detection of incurable disease. Our secondary endpoint was disease-free survival following gastrectomy. Decision theory, economic, and predictive models were generated.ResultsThe primary tumor was FDG-avid in 225/279 patients (80.6%). Seventy-two (25.8%) had FDG-avid nodes (resectable by D2 lymphadenectomy). This was not influenced by the Lauren classification. Unsuspected metastases were identified in 20 patients (7.2%). In 13 (4.7%), these would not have been otherwise identified. Decision theory and economic modeling supported routine PET-CT. Patients with FDG-avid nodes were more likely to have incurable disease (51.4% versus 15.5%; p<0.001), and a worse prognosis if not: multivariate hazard ratio 2.19 (1.23-3.91; p=0.008). Prognosis worsened with mN stage.ConclusionsPET-CT appears useful when used routinely for non-junctional gastric cancer, and should be considered in international recommendations. Any extra costs appear small and offset by avoiding futile investigations and radical treatment. mN stage identifies patients at risk of early recurrence and death.Key Points center dot PET-CT is typically not considered useful when staging gastric cancer. We describe a retrospective study of 279 patients routinely staged with PET-CT in the absence of metastases on CT.center dot The primary tumor was avid in 80% of patients. Twenty-five percent had resectable avid nodes. PET-CT identified previously unsuspected metastases in 7% of patients, which would likely not have been identified by conventional staging without PET-CT in 5%. These patients were much more likely to have avid nodes.center dot Beyond avoiding futile investigations and radical treatment in this 5%, we found patients with FDG-avid nodes (metabolic nodal stage, mN) to have a worse disease-free survival after gastrectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:2490 / 2498
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer [J].
Allum, William H. ;
Blazeby, Jane M. ;
Griffin, S. Michael ;
Cunningham, David ;
Jankowski, Janusz A. ;
Wong, Rachel .
GUT, 2011, 60 (11) :1449-1472
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HLTH RISKS EXP LOW L
[4]   MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANCE TESTS - THE BONFERRONI METHOD .10. [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6973) :170-170
[5]   Evaluating the role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in multi-disciplinary team recommendations for oesophago-gastric cancer [J].
Blencowe, N. S. ;
Whistance, R. N. ;
Strong, S. ;
Hotton, E. J. ;
Ganesh, S. ;
Roach, H. ;
Callaway, M. ;
Blazeby, J. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 109 (06) :1445-1450
[6]   Improvement in preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma with positron emission tomography [J].
Chen, J ;
Cheong, JH ;
Yun, MJ ;
Kim, J ;
Lim, JS ;
Hyung, WJ ;
Noh, SH .
CANCER, 2005, 103 (11) :2383-2390
[7]   Metabolic information on staging FDG-PET-CT as a prognostic tool in the evaluation of 97 patients with gastric cancer [J].
Coupe, Nicholas A. ;
Karikios, Deme ;
Chong, Shanley ;
Yap, June ;
Ng, Weng ;
Merrett, Neil ;
Lin, Michael .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (02) :128-135
[8]   The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM [J].
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) :1471-1474
[9]   Metabolic nodal response as a prognostic marker after neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer (vol 104, pg 408, 2017) [J].
Findlay, J. M. ;
Bradley, K. M. ;
Wang, L. M. ;
Franklin, J. M. ;
Teoh, E. J. ;
Gleeson, F. V. ;
Maynard, N. D. ;
Gillies, R. S. ;
Middleton, M. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (07)
[10]   Pragmatic staging of oesophageal cancer using decision theory involving selective endoscopic ultrasonography, PET and laparoscopy [J].
Findlay, J. M. ;
Bradley, K. M. ;
Maile, E. J. ;
Braden, B. ;
Maw, J. ;
Phillips-Hughes, J. ;
Gillies, R. S. ;
Maynard, N. D. ;
Middleton, M. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (12) :1488-1499