The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Patel, A. [1 ]
Green, N. [1 ]
Sarmah, P. [1 ]
Langman, G. [1 ]
Chandrakumaran, K. [2 ]
Youssef, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Good Hope Hosp, Heart England NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Colorectal Surg, Rectory Rd, Birmingham B75 7RR, W Midlands, England
[2] Hampshire Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Basingstoke, Hants, England
关键词
Rectal cancer; Circumferential; Resection margin; Lymph node; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; INVOLVEMENT; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTOR; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-019-01947-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThis study aimed to determine if the nature of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement, either by tumour or lymph nodes, had an impact upon local recurrence and survival in rectal cancer.MethodsA retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Consecutive patients with stage I-III rectal cancer having curative surgery were included. All specimens were analysed by a single histopathologist. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared test and Kaplan-Meier.ResultsOf 265 patients, 29 (11%) had a positive CRM. Compared to patients with a negative CRM, a positive margin due to tumour was associated with a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (43.7% versus 8.8%, p=0.001) and distant metastases (62% versus 13.6%, p=0.001) with poorer 5-year cancer-specific survival (32% versus 87.8%, p=0.001). Although patients with margin positivity due to lymph nodes had a higher rate of distant metastases (41.3% versus 13.6%, p=0.004) and poorer 5-year cancer-specific survival (59.3% versus 87.8%, p=0.038), the rate of local recurrence was comparable to that of patients with negative margins (8.3% versus 8.8%, p=0.694).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the nature of CRM involvement may be important in determining prognosis in rectal cancer. Local recurrence is higher only when there is tumour present at the margin. Lymph node involvement of the margin confers similar risk of local recurrence to patients with CRM-negative, node-positive disease. These results need further evaluation in multicentre, prospective studies.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 159
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    A. Patel
    N. Green
    P. Sarmah
    G. Langman
    K. Chandrakumaran
    H. Youssef
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2019, 23 : 151 - 159
  • [2] Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Hiranyakas, A.
    da Silva, G.
    Wexner, S. D.
    Ho, Y. -H.
    Allende, D.
    Berho, M.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (03) : 298 - 303
  • [3] Predictors of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer: A Current Audit of the National Cancer Database
    Simon, Hillary L.
    de Paula, Thais Reif
    Profeta da Luz, Magda M.
    Kiran, Ravi P.
    Keller, Deborah S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (09) : 1096 - 1105
  • [4] Occurrence and prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement for patients with rectal cancer
    Wang, Cun
    Zhou, Zong-guang
    Yu, Yong-yang
    Shu, Ye
    Li, Yuan
    Yang, Lie
    Li, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (04) : 385 - 390
  • [5] Reporting of Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Manisundaram, Naveen
    Dibrito, Sandra R.
    Hu, Chung-Yuan
    Kim, Youngwan
    Wick, Elizabeth
    Palis, Bryan
    Peacock, Oliver
    Chang, George J.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2023, 158 (11) : 1195 - 1202
  • [6] High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Rickles, Aaron S.
    Dietz, David W.
    Chang, George J.
    Wexner, Steven D.
    Berho, Mariana E.
    Remzi, Feza H.
    Greene, Frederick L.
    Fleshman, James W.
    Abbas, Maher A.
    Peters, Walter
    Noyes, Katia
    Monson, John R. T.
    Fleming, Fergal J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (06) : 891 - 898
  • [7] A Circumferential Resection Margin of 1 mm Is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Patients With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Park, Jong Seob
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Park, Yoon Ah
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Chun, Ho-Kyung
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (08) : 933 - 940
  • [8] Circumferential Resection Margin as a Prognostic Marker in the Modern Multidisciplinary Management of Rectal Cancer
    Nikberg, Maziar
    Kindler, Csaba
    Chabok, Abbas
    Letocha, Henry
    Shetye, Jayant
    Smedh, Kenneth
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (03) : 275 - 282
  • [9] Outcomes of rectal cancer patients with a positive pathological circumferential resection margin
    Swapnil Patel
    Mufaddal Kazi
    Ashwin L. Desouza
    Vivek Sukumar
    Jayesh Gori
    Munita Bal
    Avanish Saklani
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2022, 407 : 1151 - 1159
  • [10] Does circumferential tumor location affect the circumferential resection margin status in mid and low rectal cancer?
    Kang, Byung Mo
    Park, Yong-Koo
    Park, Sun Jin
    Lee, Kil Yeon
    Kim, Chang Woo
    Lee, Suk-Hwan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 41 (03) : 257 - 263