Changes in the antimicrobial potential of egg albumen during the early stages of incubation and its impact on the growth and virulence response of Salmonella Enteritidis

被引:12
作者
Fang, Jun [1 ]
Ma, Meihu [1 ]
Jin, Yongguo [1 ]
Qiu, Ning [1 ]
Ren, Guodong [1 ]
Huang, Xin [1 ]
Wang, Chan [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Natl R&D Ctr Egg Proc, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Egg albumen; Incubation; Antimicrobial protein; Antimicrobial activity; Salmonella Enteritidis; WHITE; TEMPERATURE; EXPRESSION; RESISTANCE; PROTEINS; HILA; TIME; PH;
D O I
10.4081/ijas.2012.e17
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The antimicrobial activity of egg albumen has been widely documented. However, the changes in the chemical nature and antimicrobial activity of egg albumen and the way it controls bacteria during the incubation period have not up to now been understood. The purpose of the present investigation was to analyze the antimicrobial potential of egg albumen during early incubation stages (0-5 days). The changes in ovotransferrin and lysozyme content in egg albumen were quantified via high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results showed that the increase in concentration of ovotransferrin in egg albumen was closely related to the time of incubation, but that of lysozyme remained substantially unchanged and was very similar to that of the non-incubated eggs. The iron ion binding capacity and specific lysozyme activity of the egg albumen during early stages of incubation was also investigated. The changes occurring in egg albumen during early incubation could influence the growth of Salmonella Enteritidis. Very little difference was observed in the virulence response of Salmonella Enteritidis to egg albumen collected at different incubation periods by using the expression of hilA gene as an indicator. Since the first few days of incubation are likely to place heavy demands on the immune capacities of the egg, due to the defenceless immune system of the developing embryo, the changes in antimicrobial activity in egg albumen widen our understanding of the innate immune mechanism of the fertilized egg during its early embryonic development.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 97
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Role of Incubation Conditions and Protein Fraction on the Antimicrobial Activity of Egg White against Salmonella Enteritidis and Escherichia coli [J].
Alabdeh, Maria ;
Lechevalier, Valerie ;
Nau, Fracoise ;
Gautier, Michel ;
Cochet, Marie-Fracoise ;
Gonnet, Fabienne ;
Jan, Sophie ;
Baron, Florence .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2011, 74 (01) :24-31
[2]  
Araki T., 2000, KYUSHU TOKAI U ED, V19, P29
[3]   hilA is a novel ompR/toxR family member that activates the expression of Salmonella typhimurium invasion genes [J].
Bajaj, V ;
Hwang, C ;
Lee, CA .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 18 (04) :715-727
[4]   Co-ordinate regulation of Salmonella typhimurium invasion genes by environmental and regulatory factors is mediated by control of hilA expression [J].
Bajaj, V ;
Lucas, RL ;
Hwang, C ;
Lee, CA .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 22 (04) :703-714
[5]   Factors involved in the inhibition of growth of Salmonella enteritidis in liquid egg white [J].
Baron, F ;
Gautier, M ;
Brule, G .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1997, 60 (11) :1318-1323
[6]   Effects of presence of a blastoderm on albumen height and pH of broiler hatching eggs [J].
Benton, CE ;
Walsh, TJ ;
Brake, J .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2001, 80 (07) :955-957
[7]   Why are pathogenic staphylococci so lysozyme resistant?: The peptidoglycan O-acetyltransferase OatA is the major determinant for lysozyme resistance of Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Bera, A ;
Herbert, S ;
Jakob, A ;
Vollmer, W ;
Götz, F .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 55 (03) :778-787
[8]   NONSPECIFIC ANTIMICROBIAL DEFENCES OF AVIAN EGG, EMBRYO AND NEONATE [J].
BOARD, RG ;
FULLER, R .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1974, 49 (01) :15-+
[9]  
Burley RW., 1989, AVIAN EGG CHEM BIOL, pSons
[10]   Microbial infection affects egg viability and incubation behavior in a tropical passerine [J].
Cook, MI ;
Beissinger, SR ;
Toranzos, GA ;
Rodriguez, RA ;
Arendt, WJ .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2005, 16 (01) :30-36