Energy and exergy analyses of a novel seasonal CCHP system driven by a gas turbine integrated with a biomass gasification unit and a LiBr-water absorption chiller

被引:67
作者
Asgari, N. [1 ]
Khoshbakhti, R. [1 ]
Mirmasoumi, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sahand Univ Technol, Fac Mech Engn, Sahand New Town, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Chabahar Maritime Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Chabahar, Iran
关键词
Absorption chiller; CCHP; Exergy analysis; Gasification; Gas turbine; Seasonal study; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; HYDROGEN-RICH GAS; NATURAL-GAS; STEAM GASIFICATION; TRIGENERATION SYSTEM; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSES; POWER; HEAT; PERFORMANCE; FUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113096
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Combined cooling, heating, and power systems have been studied extensively because of their great potentials. Accordingly, in the present study, an innovative trigeneration system including a gas turbine cycle, a gasification unit, a heating unit, alongside a single effect absorption refrigeration cycle is proposed. The system operates on natural gas and municipal solid waste (MSW) for cooling, heating, and power generation. The designed system was simulated using Engineering Equation Solver (EES) software through two scenarios; constant power output and constant biomass feed rate, considering seasonal and annual periods. In the first scenario, considering the constant power capacity, the basic design state was considered with the biomass mixing ratio of 50%, and the results of the seasonal study showed that the system capacity is 30 MW, 41.9 MW, and 39.24 MW in terms of electricity, heating, and cooling, respectively. The exergy analysis revealed that the combustion chamber, the evaporator of Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG), and the gasifier in both hot and cold seasons have the highest exergy destruction rate, while the economizers and the evaporators of both HRSGs have the lowest exergy efficiency. The constant mass flow rate of MSW was assumed to be 1.5 kg/s and accordingly, the feed rate of natural gas was also 1.5 kg/s for the mixing ratio of 50% in basic design state of the second scenario, and the results indicated that the annual average capacity of the system for electricity, heating, and cooling generation is 27.43 MW, 40 MW, and 34.15 MW, respectively. Furthermore, the system was capable of providing the domestic hot water supply of end-user with an average capacity of 7.5 MW during a year. The annual Energy Utilization Factor (EUF) and the annual exergy efficiency of the overall system were shown to be 71.25% and 30.79%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Review of tri-generation technologies: Design evaluation, optimization, decision-making, and selection approach [J].
Al Moussawi, Houssein ;
Fardoun, Farouk ;
Louahlia-Gualous, Hasna .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 120 :157-196
[2]   Performance comparison of three trigeneration systems using organic rankine cycles [J].
Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. ;
Hamdullahpur, Feridun ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (09) :5741-5754
[3]  
Alauddin ZA, 1996, THESIS
[4]   Prediction of the working parameters of a wood waste gasifier through an equilibrium model [J].
Altafini, CR ;
Wander, PR ;
Barreto, RM .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 44 (17) :2763-2777
[5]   Theoretical analysis of LiBr/H2O absorption refrigeration systems [J].
Arora, Akhilesh ;
Kaushik, S. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2009, 33 (15) :1321-1340
[6]   Gas turbine steam injection and combined power cycles using fog inlet cooling and biomass fuel: A thermodynamic assessment [J].
Athari, Hassan ;
Soltani, Saeed ;
Rosen, Marc A. ;
Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed ;
Morosuk, Tatiana .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 92 :95-103
[7]   Modeling of biomass gasification: A review [J].
Baruah, Dipal ;
Baruah, D. C. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 :806-815
[8]  
Basu P, 2010, BIOMASS GASIFICATION AND PYROLYSIS: PRACTICAL DESIGN AND THEORY, P1
[9]  
Bejan A., 1995, Thermal Design and Optimization
[10]   Key factors influencing the environmental performance of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration Waste-to-Energy technologies [J].
Dong, Jun ;
Tang, Yuanjun ;
Nzihou, Ange ;
Chi, Yong .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 196 (497-512) :497-512