The Explication of Implicit Team Knowledge and Its Supporting Effect on Team Processes and Technical Innovations An Action Regulation Perspective on Team Reflexivity

被引:29
作者
Mueller, Andreas [1 ]
Herbig, Britta [1 ]
Petrovic, Kostanija [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, D-8000 Munich, Germany
关键词
teams; team processes; team innovation; intervention; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/1046496408326574
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A framework for the analysis of implicit team knowledge is developed based on action regulation theory and concepts of individual implicit knowledge. We argue that the explication and reflection on implicit knowledge in and of teams supports an individual understanding and a shared mental model of the task which in turn should enhance team innovation. In an experimental study, 48 students of mechanical engineering in 16 groups worked on a product development task. Experimental conditions were explication versus no explication and individual versus collective explication. Individual as well as collective explication enhanced the overall outcome quality, but not the originality of solutions. The positive effects of collective explication were stronger than the effects of individual explication. Group processes and contents of explication were in line with the assumption from action regulation theory that reflecting on goals and strategies facilitates performance of complex tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 51
页数:24
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, DEV CREATIVITY ORG
[2]  
Arrow H., 2000, Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation
[3]  
Benzecri Jean-Pierre, 1992, Correspondence analysis handbook
[4]   Implicit and explicit knowledge -: influences on action in critical situations [J].
Büssing, A ;
Herbig, B ;
Ewert, T .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE, 2001, 209 (02) :174-200
[5]  
Bussing A., 2003, INT REV IND ORG PSYC, V18, P239
[6]  
CANNONBOWERS JA, 1993, INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DECISION MAKING, P221
[7]   Reflexivity, effectiveness, and mental health in BBC-TV production teams [J].
Carter, SM ;
West, MA .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1998, 29 (05) :583-601
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, V2nd
[9]  
De Dreu C.K. W., 2002, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, V11, P285, DOI DOI 10.1080/13594320244000175
[10]   Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold [J].
Dienes, Z ;
Berry, D .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1997, 4 (01) :3-23