Confirming regional 1 cm differential geoid accuracy from airborne gravimetry: the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011

被引:46
作者
Smith, Dru A. [1 ]
Holmes, Simon A. [2 ]
Li, Xiaopeng [3 ]
Guillaume, Sebastien [4 ]
Wang, Yan Ming [1 ]
Buerki, Beat [4 ]
Roman, Daniel R. [1 ]
Damiani, Theresa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Natl Geodet Survey, Silver Spring, MD USA
[2] SGT Inc, Greenbelt, MD USA
[3] ERT Inc, Laurel, MD USA
[4] ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Geoid; GRAV-D; GSVS11; NAVD; 88; Geoid accuracy; Airborne gravity; Geodetic surveying; Gravimetry; Deflections of the vertical; Astro-geodesy; VERTICAL DEFLECTIONS; MODELS; GRAVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00190-013-0653-0
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
A terrestrial survey, called the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011 (GSVS11), encompassing leveling, GPS, astrogeodetic deflections of the vertical (DOV) and surface gravity was performed in the United States. The general purpose of that survey was to evaluate the current accuracy of gravimetric geoid models, and also to determine the impact of introducing new airborne gravity data from the 'Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum' (GRAV-D) project. More specifically, the GSVS11 survey was performed to determine whether or not the GRAV-D airborne gravimetry, flown at 11 km altitude, can reduce differential geoid error to below 1 cm in a low, flat gravimetrically uncomplicated region. GSVS11 comprises a 325 km traverse from Austin to Rockport in Southern Texas, and includes 218 GPS stations ( cm over any distance from 0.4 to 325 km) co-located with first-order spirit leveled orthometric heights ( cm end-to-end), including new surface gravimetry, and 216 astronomically determined vertical deflections . The terrestrial survey data were compared in various ways to specific geoid models, including analysis of RMS residuals between all pairs of points on the line, direct comparison of DOVs to geoid slopes, and a harmonic analysis of the differences between the terrestrial data and various geoid models. These comparisons of the terrestrial survey data with specific geoid models showed conclusively that, in this type of region (low, flat) the geoid models computed using existing terrestrial gravity, combined with digital elevation models (DEMs) and GRACE and GOCE data, differential geoid accuracy of 1 to 3 cm (1 over distances from 0.4 to 325 km were currently being achieved. However, the addition of a contemporaneous airborne gravity data set, flown at 11 km altitude, brought the estimated differential geoid accuracy down to 1 cm over nearly all distances from 0.4 to 325 km.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 907
页数:23
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GSTM SPP 15 17 OCT 2
  • [2] [Anonymous], STAND SPEC GEOD CONT
  • [3] [Anonymous], IGES B
  • [4] Airborne gravimetry: An investigation of filtering
    Childers, VA
    Bell, RE
    Brozena, JM
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 1999, 64 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [5] CHILDERS VA, 1996, THESIS COLUMBIA U
  • [6] First airborne gravity results over the Thwaites Glacier catchment, West Antarctica
    Diehl, Theresa M.
    Holt, John W.
    Blankenship, Donald D.
    Young, Duncan A.
    Jordan, Tom A.
    Ferraccioli, Fausto
    [J]. GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2008, 9
  • [7] The shuttle radar topography mission
    Farr, Tom G.
    Rosen, Paul A.
    Caro, Edward
    Crippen, Robert
    Duren, Riley
    Hensley, Scott
    Kobrick, Michael
    Paller, Mimi
    Rodriguez, Ernesto
    Roth, Ladislav
    Seal, David
    Shaffer, Scott
    Shimada, Joanne
    Umland, Jeffrey
    Werner, Marian
    Oskin, Michael
    Burbank, Douglas
    Alsdorf, Douglas
    [J]. REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 45 (02)
  • [8] Fitting gravimetric geoid models to vertical deflections
    Featherstone, W. E.
    Lichti, D. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2009, 83 (06) : 583 - 589
  • [9] On the geoid-quasigeoid separation in mountain areas
    Flury, Jakob
    Rummel, Reiner
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2009, 83 (09) : 829 - 847
  • [10] Forsberg R., 2012, Int. J. Phys. Sci., V7, P6012