Reporting guidelines for modelling studies

被引:35
作者
Bennett, Carol [1 ,2 ]
Manuel, Douglas G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[2] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, ICES uOttawa, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Dept Family Med, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, CT Lamont Primary Hlth Care Res Ctr, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Bruyere Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[6] Univ Ottawa, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; SIMULATION-MODELS; QUALITY; CONSORT; RECOMMENDATIONS; PRINCIPLES;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2288-12-168
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Modelling studies are used widely to help inform decisions about health care and policy and their use is increasing. However, in order for modelling to gain strength as a tool for health policy, it is critical that key model factors are transparent so that users of models can have a clear understanding of the model and its limitations. Reporting guidelines are evidence-based tools that specify minimum criteria for authors to report their research such that readers can both critically appraise and interpret study findings. This study was conducted to determine whether there is an unmet need for population modelling reporting guidelines. Methods: We conducted a review of the literature to identify: 1) guidance for reporting population modelling studies; and, 2) evidence on the quality of reporting of population modelling studies. Guidance for reporting was analysed using a thematic approach and the data was summarised as frequencies. Evidence on the quality of reporting was reviewed and summarized descriptively. Results: There were no guidelines that specifically addressed the reporting of population modelling studies. We identified a number of reporting guidelines for economic evaluation studies, some of which had sections that were relevant population modelling studies. Amongst seven relevant records, we identified 69 quality criteria that have distinct reporting characteristics. We identified two papers that addressed reporting practices of modelling studies. Overall, with the exception of describing the data used for calibration, there was little consistency in reporting. Conclusions: While numerous guidelines exist for developing and evaluating health technology assessment and economic evaluation models, which by extension could be applicable to population modelling studies, there is variation in their comprehensiveness and in the consistency of reporting these methods. Population modelling studies may be an area which would benefit from the development of a reporting guideline.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: Recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies [J].
Drummond, M ;
Manca, A ;
Sculpher, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 21 (02) :165-171
[2]   The ISPOR good practice modeling principles - A sensible approach: Be transparent, be reasonable [J].
Garrison, LP .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (01) :6-8
[3]   Validation of population-based disease simulation models: a review of concepts and methods [J].
Kopec, Jacek A. ;
Fines, Philippe ;
Manuel, Douglas G. ;
Buckeridge, David L. ;
Flanagan, William M. ;
Oderkirk, Jillian ;
Abrahamowicz, Michal ;
Harper, Samuel ;
Sharif, Behnam ;
Okhmatovskaia, Anya ;
Sayre, Eric C. ;
Rahman, M. Mushfiqur ;
Wolfson, Michael C. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10
[4]   Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines [J].
Moher, David ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Simera, Iveta ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (02)
[5]  
Nuijten MJC, 1998, PHARMACOECONOMICS, V14, P259
[6]  
Philips Z, 2001, REV GUIDELINES GOOD, V8, piii
[7]   Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review [J].
Plint, Amy C. ;
Moher, David ;
Morrison, Andra ;
Schulz, Kenneth ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Hill, Catherine ;
Gaboury, Isabelle .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2006, 185 (05) :263-267
[8]   A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials [J].
Prady, Stephanie L. ;
Richmond, Stewart J. ;
Morton, Veronica M. ;
MacPherson, Hugh .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (02)
[9]   The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement - Has it improved? [J].
Smidt, N. ;
Rutjes, A. W. S. ;
van der Windt, D. A. W. M. ;
Ostelo, R. W. J. G. ;
Bossuyt, P. M. ;
Reitsma, J. B. ;
Bouter, L. M. ;
de Vet, H. C. W. .
NEUROLOGY, 2006, 67 (05) :792-797
[10]   Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards Reporting Trials (CONSORT) [J].
Smith, Barbara A. ;
Lee, Hyeon-Joo ;
Lee, Ju Hee ;
Choi, Mona ;
Jones, Deborah E. ;
Bousell, R. Barker ;
Broome, Marion E. .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2008, 56 (01) :31-37