Selecting a Site for a Radioactive Waste Repository: A Historical Analysis

被引:15
作者
Metlay, Daniel S. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Nucl Waste Tech Review Board, 2300 Clarendon Blvd,Suite 1300, Arlington, VA 22201 USA
关键词
radioactive waste; geological repository siting; social acceptability;
D O I
10.2113/gselements.12.4.269
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Every nation that has adopted a strategy for the long-term management of its high-level radioactive waste (HLW) and spent nuclear fuel (SF) has opted for disposal in a deep-mined, geological repository. Identifying a site for such a facility has proven to be a technical and social challenge. Over the last 50 years, both challenges have been met (at least so far) in only three out of the ten countries that have tried. This historical experience makes clear how important it is to gain social acceptability for a site's selection: such acceptability is a prerequisite for policymaking in democratic societies. The inability to gain social acceptability has proven to be the Achilles' heel for most efforts to choose a repository site.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Ahlstrom P-E, 2001, REPOSITORY PROJECT G
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MOV FORW TOG PROC SE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, FACILITY SITING RISK
[4]  
Appel D, 2006, COOPERATIVE RES GOVE, P39
[5]  
Barthe Yannick, 2001, J RISK RES, V4, P411
[6]  
Carter LutherJ., 1987, Nuclear Imperatives and Public Trust-Dealing with Radioactive Waste
[7]  
Chu Steven, 2010, COMMUNICATION
[8]  
*DEFRA, 2008, MAN RAD WAST SAF FRA
[9]   TRUST AS A DETERMINANT OF OPPOSITION TO A HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE-WASTE REPOSITORY - ANALYSIS OF A STRUCTURAL MODEL [J].
FLYNN, J ;
BURNS, W ;
MERTZ, CK ;
SLOVIC, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1992, 12 (03) :417-429
[10]   Concerned public and the paralysis of decision-making: nuclear waste management policy in Germany [J].
Hocke, Peter ;
Renn, Ortwin .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2009, 12 (7-8) :921-940