Comparative study on two colonic bowel preparations for patients with chronic constipation

被引:11
作者
Chen, Huimin [1 ]
Li, Xiaobo [1 ]
Ge, Zhizheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Renji Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai Inst Digest Dis,Dept Gastroenterol, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
关键词
Bowel preparation; constipation; polyethylene glycol; sodium phosphate; ORAL SODIUM-PHOSPHATE; POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; COLONOSCOPY;
D O I
10.1080/00365520802538211
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To determine the efficacy, tolerance, and safety of oral sodium phosphate compared with polyethylene glycol in patients with chronic constipation. Material and methods. From May 2007 to October 2007, 100 patients with chronic constipation were prospectively randomized into two groups for colonoscopy. Group A (n=49) received sodium phosphate before colonoscopy, while Group B (n=51) received polyethylene glycol. During the same period, another 50 patients in Group C with normal defecation function were enrolled and received the polyethylene glycol preparation. Patients with intestinal stenosis found by colonoscopy were excluded. The quality of preparation was assessed by the endoscopist, who was blinded to the types of bowel preparation. Laboratory examinations including hematocrit, serum phosphorous, serum calcium, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine were carried out in Groups A and B before and after preparation. A questionnaire was used to assess adverse effects and patients' tolerance to the bowel preparation. Results. Two patients in Group A with a diagnosis of malignant tumor detected by colonoscopy were excluded. The baseline parameters, including weight, age, gender, endoscopic diagnosis, or constipation status, were homogeneously distributed in the three groups. It was shown that the quality of preparation in Group B was poorer than that in Group C (p0.05). Compared with Group B, Group A showed better quality of preparation, a smaller amount of intestinal air bubble, and a higher number of defecations after taking the medicine (p0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in acceptance of the two preparations and the prevalence of adverse effects. Transient hyperphosphatasemia was noted in four patients in Group A, but neither clinical symptoms nor hypocalcemia was observed. Conclusions. Based on our preliminary study, in the preparation of patients with chronic constipation for colonoscopy, sodium phosphate is just as well tolerated and safe as a standard polyethylene glycol preparation and might provide a better quality of bowel preparation.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 379
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy [J].
Belsey, J. ;
Epstein, O. ;
Heresbach, D. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 25 (04) :373-384
[2]  
Bowers Ben, 2006, Br J Nurs, V15, P378
[3]   Bowel preparation for gastrointestinal procedures [J].
Brown A.R. ;
DiPalma J.A. .
Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2004, 6 (5) :395-401
[4]  
BYRNEM F, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V7, P1587
[5]  
De Salvo Luigi, 2006, Ann Ital Chir, V77, P143
[6]  
DiPalma J. A., 2004, Rev Gastroenterol Disord, V4, P34
[7]   Effects of polyethylene glycol 4000 on 24-h manometric recordings of left colonic motor activity [J].
Herve, S ;
Leroi, AM ;
Mathiex-Fortunet, H ;
Garnier, P ;
Karoui, S ;
Menard, JF ;
Ducrotte, P ;
Denis, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 13 (06) :647-654
[8]   A randomized, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of sodium phosphate tablets with 2L polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for colon cleansing [J].
Johanson, John F. ;
Popp, John W., Jr. ;
Cohen, Lawrence B. ;
Lottes, Sandra R. ;
Forbes, William P. ;
Walker, Kelli ;
Carter, Edwin ;
Zhang, Bing ;
Rose, Martin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (10) :2238-2246
[9]   Acute kidney injury [J].
Kellum, John A. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (04) :S141-S145
[10]  
Kellum JA, 2007, CONTRIB NEPHROL, V156, P10