Determining Benchmarks in Hearing Preservation Surgery for Vestibular Schwannoma

被引:0
作者
Gluth, Michael B. [1 ]
Day, John D. [2 ]
Dornhoffer, John L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
关键词
vestibular schwannoma; acoustic neuroma; hearing preservation; number needed to treat; MIDDLE FOSSA APPROACH; ACOUSTIC NEUROMA SURGERY; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1312710
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The objectives of this study were to determine minimal benchmarks of success in vestibular schwannoma hearing preservation surgery, wherein the likelihood of having preserved hearing in a single patient is at least as likely as having created a poor facial nerve outcome for a single patient. Design This is a statistical analysis of published literature. Setting Academic Tertiary Medical Center. Main Outcome Measures Based on published natural history data, the number needed to treat (NNT) equation was used to calculate the minimally acceptable hearing preservation rates within various hearing classification schemes. Results Given good facial nerve outcome rates of 85, 90, and 95%, the corresponding hearing preservation rates at 4.7 years that are likely to preserve classes A and B hearing (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery classification) in a single patient as to cause a poor facial nerve outcome are 70, 65, and 60%, respectively. If surgery is limited exclusively to intracanalicular tumors, these rates drop to 62, 57, and 52%, respectively. If the word recognition scoring classification is used, required hearing preservation rates are higher. Conclusion It is possible to use the NNT equation alongside projected facial nerve outcomes to estimate benchmarks of minimally acceptable hearing preservation rates.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 280
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, V113, P179
[2]   Individualizing hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery [J].
Arriaga, MA ;
Chen, DA ;
Fukushima, T .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1997, 107 (08) :1043-1047
[3]   Facial function in hearing preservation acoustic neuroma surgery [J].
Arriaga, MA ;
Chen, DA .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2001, 127 (05) :543-546
[4]   Hearing preservation and facial nerve outcomes in vestibular schwannoma surgery: Results using the middle cranial fossa approach [J].
Arts, HA ;
Telian, SA ;
El-Kashlan, H ;
Thompson, BG .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (02) :234-241
[5]   Prognostic factors for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery [J].
Brackmann, DE ;
Owens, RM ;
Friedman, RA ;
Hitselberger, WE ;
De la Cruz, A ;
House, JW ;
Nelson, RA ;
Luxford, WM ;
Slattery, WH ;
Fayad, JN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2000, 21 (03) :417-424
[6]   Hearing in patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas [J].
Caye-Thomasen, Per ;
Dethloff, Thomas ;
Hansen, Soren ;
Stangerup, Sven-Eric ;
Thomsen, Jens .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2007, 12 (01) :1-12
[7]   Is the middle fossa approach the treatment of choice for intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma? [J].
Colletti, V ;
Fiorino, F .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2005, 132 (03) :459-466
[8]   Middle fossa versus retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach in vestibular schwannoma surgery: A prospective study [J].
Colletti, V ;
Fiorino, F .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2003, 24 (06) :927-934
[9]   THE NUMBER NEEDED TO TREAT - A CLINICALLY USEFUL MEASURE OF TREATMENT EFFECT [J].
COOK, RJ ;
SACKETT, DL .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6977) :452-454
[10]   HEARING PRESERVATION IN ACOUSTIC TUMOR SURGERY - RESULTS AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS [J].
DORNHOFFER, JL ;
HELMS, J ;
HOEHMANN, DH .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1995, 105 (02) :184-187